Pancreatic cysts: a proposed management algorithm based on current evidence

Currently, the management strategy of pancreatic cyst (PC) remains controversial because of the inability to diagnose this type of cyst accurately and the limited knowledge of its natural history. Previously, many clinicians have advocated an aggressive resectional policy. This approach is no longer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 193; no. 6; pp. 749 - 755
Main Authors Goh, Brian K.P., Tan, Yu-Meng, Chung, Yaw-Fui Alexander, Chow, Pierce K.H., Cheow, Peng-Chung, Thng, Choon-Hua, Mesenas, Steven, Wong, Wai-Keong, Ooi, London L.P.J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.06.2007
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0002-9610
1879-1883
1879-1883
DOI10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.07.019

Cover

More Information
Summary:Currently, the management strategy of pancreatic cyst (PC) remains controversial because of the inability to diagnose this type of cyst accurately and the limited knowledge of its natural history. Previously, many clinicians have advocated an aggressive resectional policy. This approach is no longer appropriate, and the number of PCs detected incidentally has increased. This study reviews the present literature and attempts to provide a management algorithm of pancreatic cysts based on currently available evidence. A Medline search was conducted to identify studies investigating PC, with particular emphasis placed on studies addressing its diagnosis and management. Additional articles were obtained from the reference lists of key articles and recent reviews. Based on current evidence, the optimal management of PC remains an art and should be individualized based on the risk–benefit ratio of surgery, which is influenced by multiple factors, such as the patient’s potential life expectancy, surgical risk; and malignant potential of the cyst. Our proposed management algorithm is based on an individual’s predicted risk–benefit ratio of surgery. Prospective evaluation of the algorithm is needed to determine its integrity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.07.019