Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection—An Algorithm-Based Approach

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the most challenging and devastating modes of failure after total hip and knee arthroplasties. Despite the profound urgency and impact of PJI on an individual and societal basis, historically, there have not been standardized definitions of and dia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of arthroplasty Vol. 32; no. 7; pp. 2047 - 2050
Main Authors Ting, Nicholas T., Della Valle, Craig J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0883-5403
1532-8406
1532-8406
DOI10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.070

Cover

More Information
Summary:Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the most challenging and devastating modes of failure after total hip and knee arthroplasties. Despite the profound urgency and impact of PJI on an individual and societal basis, historically, there have not been standardized definitions of and diagnostic algorithms for infection after total joint arthroplasty. In a recent symposium, the American Academy of Hip and Knee Surgeons put forth a standardized approach to the prevention, diagnosis, and management of the patient with a suspected PJI. This review article summarizes these findings, and reviews the algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of PJI. The diagnosis of PJI is easily made in our experience in 90% of patients by getting an erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein followed by selective aspiration of the joint if these values are elevated or if the clinical suspicion is high. Synovial fluid obtained should be sent for a synovial fluid white blood cell count, differential, and cultures.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.070