Neuroscience and eating disorders: The allocentric lock hypothesis

Evidence from psychology and neuroscience indicates that our spatial experience, including the bodily one, involves the integration of different sensory inputs within two different reference frames egocentric (body as reference of first-person experience) and allocentric (body as object in the physi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical hypotheses Vol. 78; no. 2; pp. 254 - 257
Main Author Riva, Giuseppe
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0306-9877
1532-2777
1532-2777
DOI10.1016/j.mehy.2011.10.039

Cover

More Information
Summary:Evidence from psychology and neuroscience indicates that our spatial experience, including the bodily one, involves the integration of different sensory inputs within two different reference frames egocentric (body as reference of first-person experience) and allocentric (body as object in the physical world). Even if functional relations between these two frames are usually limited, they influence each other during the interaction between long- and short-term memory processes in spatial cognition. If, for some reasons, this process is impaired, the egocentric sensory inputs are no more able to update the contents of the allocentric representation of the body: the subject is locked to it. In the presented perspective, subjects with eating disorders are locked to an allocentric representation of their body, stored in long-term memory (allocentric lock). A significant role in the locking may be played by the medial temporal lobe, and in particular by the connection between the hippocampal complex and amygdala. The differences between exogenous and endogenous causes of the lock may also explain the difference between bulimia nervosa and anorexia nervosa.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0306-9877
1532-2777
1532-2777
DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2011.10.039