Dopamine and acetylcholine have distinct roles in delay- and effort-based decision-making in humans

In everyday life, we encounter situations that require tradeoffs between potential rewards and associated costs, such as time and (physical) effort. The literature indicates a prominent role for dopamine in discounting of both delay and effort, with mixed findings for delay discounting in humans. Mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPLoS biology Vol. 22; no. 7; p. e3002714
Main Authors Erfanian Abdoust, Mani, Froböse, Monja Isabel, Schnitzler, Alfons, Schreivogel, Elisabeth, Jocham, Gerhard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 12.07.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1545-7885
1544-9173
1545-7885
DOI10.1371/journal.pbio.3002714

Cover

More Information
Summary:In everyday life, we encounter situations that require tradeoffs between potential rewards and associated costs, such as time and (physical) effort. The literature indicates a prominent role for dopamine in discounting of both delay and effort, with mixed findings for delay discounting in humans. Moreover, the reciprocal antagonistic interaction between dopaminergic and cholinergic transmission in the striatum suggests a potential opponent role of acetylcholine in these processes. We found opposing effects of dopamine D2 (haloperidol) and acetylcholine M1 receptor (biperiden) antagonism on specific components of effort-based decision-making in healthy humans: haloperidol decreased, whereas biperiden increased the willingness to exert physical effort. In contrast, delay discounting was reduced under haloperidol, but not affected by biperiden. Together, our data suggest that dopamine, acting at D2 receptors, modulates both effort and delay discounting, while acetylcholine, acting at M1 receptors, appears to exert a more specific influence on effort discounting only.
Bibliography:new_version
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1545-7885
1544-9173
1545-7885
DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002714