Measurement of small fibre pain threshold values for the early detection of diabetic polyneuropathy

Aim To investigate whether Aδ and C fibre pain threshold values, measured using intra‐epidermal electrical stimulation (IES), in people with and without Type 2 diabetes are useful in evaluating diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) severity. Methods Aδ and C fibre pain threshold values were measured in Japa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetic medicine Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 62 - 69
Main Authors Kukidome, D., Nishikawa, T., Sato, M., Igata, M., Kawashima, J., Shimoda, S., Matsui, K., Obayashi, K., Ando, Y., Araki, E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0742-3071
1464-5491
1464-5491
DOI10.1111/dme.12797

Cover

More Information
Summary:Aim To investigate whether Aδ and C fibre pain threshold values, measured using intra‐epidermal electrical stimulation (IES), in people with and without Type 2 diabetes are useful in evaluating diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) severity. Methods Aδ and C fibre pain threshold values were measured in Japanese people with (n = 120) and without (n = 76) Type 2 diabetes by IES. Nerve conduction studies and other tests were performed to evaluate diabetic complications. Results Aδ and C fibre pain threshold values were high in people with diabetes compared with control subjects (Aδ fibre: 0.050 vs. 0.030 mA, P < 0.01; C fibre: 0.180 vs. 0.070 mA, P < 0.01). Participants with diabetes and neuropathy had significantly higher Aδ and C fibre pain threshold values than participants without neuropathy (Aδ fibres 0.063 vs. 0.039 mA, P < 0.01; C fibres 0.202 vs. 0.098 mA, P < 0.05). C fibre pain threshold values were significantly higher in participants with diabetes and diabetic microvascular complications than in participants without complications. Threshold values increased with complication progression. When DPN was diagnosed according to the Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group in Japan criteria, the cut‐off for the C fibre pain threshold values was 0.125 mA (area under the curve 0.758, sensitivity 81.5%, specificity 61.5%). The IES test took less time (P < 0.01) and was less invasive (P < 0.01) than the nerve conduction studies. Conclusions Intra‐epidermal electrical stimulation is a non‐invasive and easy measurement of small fibre pain threshold values. It may be clinically useful for C fibre measurement to diagnose early DPN as defined by the Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group in Japan criteria. What's new? We evaluated small fibre pain threshold values for people with and without diabetes by intra‐epidermal electrical stimulation (IES) with the use of a newly developed portable stimulator, PNS‐7000. Our results show that small fibre pain threshold values were significantly higher in the group with diabetes compared with the group without diabetes, especially in those with abnormal neuropathic findings, diabetic retinopathy or diabetic nephropathy. We also found that IES took less time and was less invasive than nerve conduction studies. Our findings show that IES may be used for detection of small fibre neuropathy and may be clinically useful for C fibre measurement to diagnose early DPN as defined by Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group in Japan criteria.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-58R693PW-Q
Manpei Suzuki Diabetes Foundation
ArticleID:DME12797
istex:3269A7A054C60A36D38E14766ABEC1E6841F97CA
Japan Diabetes Foundation
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0742-3071
1464-5491
1464-5491
DOI:10.1111/dme.12797