Clinical and Virological Efficacy of Etravirine Plus Two Active Nucleos(t)ide Analogs in an Heterogeneous HIV-Infected Population

Etravirine (ETV) is recommended in combination with a boosted protease inhibitor plus an optimized background regimen for salvage therapy, but there is limited experience with its use in combination with two nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). This multicenter study aimed to asse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 9; no. 5; p. e97262
Main Authors López-Cortés, Luis F., Viciana, Pompeyo, Girón-González, José A., Romero-Palacios, Alberto, Márquez-Solero, Manuel, Martinez-Perez, Maria A., López-Ruz, Miguel A., de la Torre-Lima, Javier, Téllez-Pérez, Francisco, Delgado-Fernández, Marcial, Garcia-Lázaro, Milagros, Lozano, Fernando, Mohamed-Balghata, Mohamed O.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 16.05.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0097262

Cover

More Information
Summary:Etravirine (ETV) is recommended in combination with a boosted protease inhibitor plus an optimized background regimen for salvage therapy, but there is limited experience with its use in combination with two nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). This multicenter study aimed to assess the efficacy of this combination in two scenarios: group A) subjects without virologic failure on or no experience with non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) switched due to adverse events and group B) subjects switched after a virologic failure on an efavirenz- or nevirapine-based regimen. The primary endpoint was efficacy at 52 weeks analysed by intention-to-treat. Virologic failure was defined as the inability to suppress plasma HIV-RNA to <50 copies/mL after 24 weeks on treatment, or a confirmed viral load >200 copies/mL in patients who had previously achieved a viral suppression or had an undetectable viral load at inclusion. Two hundred eighty seven patients were included. Treatment efficacy rates in group A and B were 88.0% (CI95, 83.9-92.1%) and 77.4% (CI95, 65.0-89.7%), respectively; the rates reached 97.2% (CI95, 95.1-99.3%) and 90.5% (CI95, 81.7-99.3), by on-treatment analysis. The once-a-day ETV treatment was as effective as the twice daily dosing regimen. Grade 1-2 adverse events were observed motivating a treatment switch in 4.2% of the subjects. In conclusion, ETV (once- or twice daily) plus two analogs is a suitable, well-tolerated combination both as a switching strategy and after failure with first generation NNRTIs, ensuring full drug activity. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01437241.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Conceived and designed the experiments: LFLC. Performed the experiments: LFLC PV JAGG ARP MMS MAMP MALR JdlTL FTP MDF MGL FL MMB. Analyzed the data: LFLC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LFLC PV JAGG ARP MMS MAMP MALR JdlTL FTP MDF MGL FL MMB. Wrote the paper: LFLC. Other: Interpretation of the data: LFLC. Collection, assembly of data and database management: LFLC. Provision of data and patients: LFLC PV JAGG ARP MMS MAMP MALR JdlTL FTP MDF MGL FL MMB. Drafting of the article: LFLC. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: PV JAGG ARP MMS MAMP MALR JdlTL FTP MDF MGL FL MMB. Final approval of the article: LFLC PV JAGG ARP MMS MAMP MALR JdlTL FTP MDF MGL FL MMB.
Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal’s policy and have the following conflicts: The authors have not conflicts of interest related to this manuscript. However, Luis F. López-Cortés, Pompeyo Viciana, José A. Girón-González, Manuel Márquez-Solero, Javier de la Torre-Lima, Marcial Delgado-Fernández, and Fernando Lozano have received honoraria for speaking at symposia organized on behalf of Abbott laboratories (Spain), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glaxo Smithkline, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag España, Merck Sharp & Dohme España, Roche Pharma SA, and ViiV Healthcare. Also, they have received unrestricted funds for research from Abbott Laboratories (Spain), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo Smithkline, Roche Pharma S.A., and ViiV Healthcare.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0097262