Clinical and Virological Efficacy of Etravirine Plus Two Active Nucleos(t)ide Analogs in an Heterogeneous HIV-Infected Population
Etravirine (ETV) is recommended in combination with a boosted protease inhibitor plus an optimized background regimen for salvage therapy, but there is limited experience with its use in combination with two nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). This multicenter study aimed to asse...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 9; no. 5; p. e97262 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Public Library of Science
16.05.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0097262 |
Cover
Summary: | Etravirine (ETV) is recommended in combination with a boosted protease inhibitor plus an optimized background regimen for salvage therapy, but there is limited experience with its use in combination with two nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). This multicenter study aimed to assess the efficacy of this combination in two scenarios: group A) subjects without virologic failure on or no experience with non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) switched due to adverse events and group B) subjects switched after a virologic failure on an efavirenz- or nevirapine-based regimen. The primary endpoint was efficacy at 52 weeks analysed by intention-to-treat. Virologic failure was defined as the inability to suppress plasma HIV-RNA to <50 copies/mL after 24 weeks on treatment, or a confirmed viral load >200 copies/mL in patients who had previously achieved a viral suppression or had an undetectable viral load at inclusion. Two hundred eighty seven patients were included. Treatment efficacy rates in group A and B were 88.0% (CI95, 83.9-92.1%) and 77.4% (CI95, 65.0-89.7%), respectively; the rates reached 97.2% (CI95, 95.1-99.3%) and 90.5% (CI95, 81.7-99.3), by on-treatment analysis. The once-a-day ETV treatment was as effective as the twice daily dosing regimen. Grade 1-2 adverse events were observed motivating a treatment switch in 4.2% of the subjects. In conclusion, ETV (once- or twice daily) plus two analogs is a suitable, well-tolerated combination both as a switching strategy and after failure with first generation NNRTIs, ensuring full drug activity.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01437241. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 Conceived and designed the experiments: LFLC. Performed the experiments: LFLC PV JAGG ARP MMS MAMP MALR JdlTL FTP MDF MGL FL MMB. Analyzed the data: LFLC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LFLC PV JAGG ARP MMS MAMP MALR JdlTL FTP MDF MGL FL MMB. Wrote the paper: LFLC. Other: Interpretation of the data: LFLC. Collection, assembly of data and database management: LFLC. Provision of data and patients: LFLC PV JAGG ARP MMS MAMP MALR JdlTL FTP MDF MGL FL MMB. Drafting of the article: LFLC. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: PV JAGG ARP MMS MAMP MALR JdlTL FTP MDF MGL FL MMB. Final approval of the article: LFLC PV JAGG ARP MMS MAMP MALR JdlTL FTP MDF MGL FL MMB. Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal’s policy and have the following conflicts: The authors have not conflicts of interest related to this manuscript. However, Luis F. López-Cortés, Pompeyo Viciana, José A. Girón-González, Manuel Márquez-Solero, Javier de la Torre-Lima, Marcial Delgado-Fernández, and Fernando Lozano have received honoraria for speaking at symposia organized on behalf of Abbott laboratories (Spain), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glaxo Smithkline, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag España, Merck Sharp & Dohme España, Roche Pharma SA, and ViiV Healthcare. Also, they have received unrestricted funds for research from Abbott Laboratories (Spain), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo Smithkline, Roche Pharma S.A., and ViiV Healthcare. |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0097262 |