Cost-Effectiveness of Aspirin Adjuvant Therapy in Early Stage Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients

Recent observational studies showed that post-operative aspirin use reduces cancer relapse and death in the earliest stages of colorectal cancer. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of aspirin as an adjuvant therapy in Stage I and II colorectal cancer patients aged 65 years and older. Two f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 9; no. 9; p. e107866
Main Authors Soon, Swee Sung, Chia, Whay-Kuang, Chan, Mun-ling Sarah, Ho, Gwo Fuang, Jian, Xiao, Deng, Yan Hong, Tan, Chuen-Seng, Sharma, Atul, Segelov, Eva, Mehta, Shaesta, Ali, Raghib, Toh, Han-Chong, Wee, Hwee-Lin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 24.09.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0107866

Cover

More Information
Summary:Recent observational studies showed that post-operative aspirin use reduces cancer relapse and death in the earliest stages of colorectal cancer. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of aspirin as an adjuvant therapy in Stage I and II colorectal cancer patients aged 65 years and older. Two five-state Markov models were constructed separately for Stage I and II colorectal cancer using TreeAge Pro 2014. Two hypothetical cohorts of 10,000 individuals at a starting age of 65 years and with colorectal cancer in remission were put through the models separately. Cost-effectiveness of aspirin was evaluated against no treatment (Stage I and II) and capecitabine (Stage II) over a 20-year period from the United States societal perspective. Extensive one-way sensitivity analyses and multivariable Probabilistic Sensitivity Analyses (PSA) were performed. In the base case analyses, aspirin was cheaper and more effective compared to other comparators in both stages. Sensitivity analyses showed that no treatment and capecitabine (Stage II only) can be cost-effective alternatives if the utility of taking aspirin is below 0.909, aspirin's annual fatal adverse event probability exceeds 0.57%, aspirin's relative risk of disease progression is 0.997 or more, or when capecitabine's relative risk of disease progression is less than 0.228. Probabilistic Sensitivity Analyses (PSA) further showed that aspirin could be cost-effective 50% to 80% of the time when the willingness-to-pay threshold was varied from USD 20,000 to USD 100,000. Even with a modest treatment benefit, aspirin is likely to be cost-effective in Stage I and II colorectal cancer, thus suggesting a potential unique role in secondary prevention in this group of patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: SSS WKC MSC HLW. Performed the experiments: SSS MSC. Analyzed the data: SSS WKC MSC HLW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HLW. Wrote the paper: SSS WKC MSC HLW. Provided critical input on analysis: SSS WKC MSC GFH XJ YHD CST AS ES SM RA HCT HLW.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0107866