Clinical Implementation of Automated Oxygen Titration in a Tertiary Care Hospital
When treating acute respiratory failure, both hypoxemia and hyperoxemia should be avoided. S should be monitored closely and O flows adjusted accordingly. Achieving this goal might be easier with automated O titration compared with manual titration of fixed-flow O . We evaluated the feasibility of u...
Saved in:
| Published in | Respiratory care Vol. 69; no. 9; p. 1081 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
01.09.2024
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1943-3654 0020-1324 1943-3654 |
| DOI | 10.4187/respcare.11331 |
Cover
| Summary: | When treating acute respiratory failure, both hypoxemia and hyperoxemia should be avoided. S
should be monitored closely and O
flows adjusted accordingly. Achieving this goal might be easier with automated O
titration compared with manual titration of fixed-flow O
. We evaluated the feasibility of using an automated O
titration device in subjects treated for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in a tertiary care hospital.
Health-care workers received education and training about oxygen therapy, and were familiarized with an automated O
titration device (FreeO
). A coordinator was available from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm during weekdays to provide technical assistance. The ability of the device to maintain S
within the prescribed therapeutic window was recorded. Basic clinical information was recorded.
Subjects were enrolled from November 2020 to August 2022. We trained 508 health-care workers on the use of automated O
titration, which was finally used on 872 occasions in 763 subjects, distributed on the respiratory, COVID-19, and thoracic surgery wards, and in the emergency department. Clinical information could be retrieved for 609 subjects (80%) who were on the system for a median (interquartile range) of 3 (2-6) d, which represented 2,567 subject-days of clinical experience with the device. In the 82 subjects (14%) for whom this information was available, the system maintained S
within the prescribed targets 89% of the time. Ninety-six subjects experienced clinical deterioration as defined by the need to be transferred to the ICU and/or requirement of high flow nasal oxygen but none of these events were judged to be related to the O
device.
Automated O
titration could be successfully implemented in hospitalized subjects with hypoxemic respiratory failure from various causes. This experience should foster further improvement of the device and recommendations for an optimized utilization. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1943-3654 0020-1324 1943-3654 |
| DOI: | 10.4187/respcare.11331 |