Artemisinin versus Nonartemisinin Combination Therapy for Uncomplicated Malaria: Randomized Clinical Trials from Four Sites in Uganda

Drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum poses a major threat to malaria control. Combination antimalarial therapy including artemisinins has been advocated recently to improve efficacy and limit the spread of resistance, but artemisinins are expensive and relatively untested in highly endemic areas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPLoS medicine Vol. 2; no. 7; p. e190
Main Authors Yeka, Adoke, Banek, Kristin, Bakyaita, Nathan, Staedke, Sarah G, Kamya, Moses R, Talisuna, Ambrose, Kironde, Fred, Nsobya, Samuel L, Kilian, Albert, Slater, Madeline, Reingold, Arthur, Rosenthal, Philip J, Wabwire-Mangen, Fred, Dorsey, Grant
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 01.07.2005
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1549-1676
1549-1277
1549-1676
DOI10.1371/journal.pmed.0020190

Cover

More Information
Summary:Drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum poses a major threat to malaria control. Combination antimalarial therapy including artemisinins has been advocated recently to improve efficacy and limit the spread of resistance, but artemisinins are expensive and relatively untested in highly endemic areas. We compared artemisinin-based and other combination therapies in four districts in Uganda with varying transmission intensity. We enrolled 2,160 patients aged 6 mo or greater with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Patients were randomized to receive chloroquine (CQ) + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP); amodiaquine (AQ) + SP; or AQ + artesunate (AS). Primary endpoints were the 28-d risks of parasitological failure either unadjusted or adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescence from new infections. A total of 2,081 patients completed follow-up, of which 1,749 (84%) were under the age of 5 y. The risk of recrudescence after treatment with CQ + SP was high, ranging from 22% to 46% at the four sites. This risk was significantly lower (p < 0.01) after AQ + SP or AQ + AS (7%-18% and 4%-12%, respectively). Compared to AQ + SP, AQ + AS was associated with a lower risk of recrudescence but a higher risk of new infection. The overall risk of repeat therapy due to any recurrent infection (recrudescence or new infection) was similar at two sites and significantly higher for AQ + AS at the two highest transmission sites (risk differences = 15% and 16%, p < 0.003). AQ + AS was the most efficacious regimen for preventing recrudescence, but this benefit was outweighed by an increased risk of new infection. Considering all recurrent infections, the efficacy of AQ + SP was at least as efficacious at all sites and superior to AQ + AS at the highest transmission sites. The high endemicity of malaria in Africa may impact on the efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy. The registration number for this trial is ISRCTN67520427 (http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/trial/|/0/67520427.html).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Author Contributions: AY, KB, NB, SGS, MRK, AT, AK, AR, PJR, FWM, and GD designed the study. AY, KB, NB, SGS, MRK, AT, FK, SLN, MS, FWM, and GD performed the experiments. AY, KB, and GD analyzed the data. AY and KB enrolled patients. AY, KB, NB, SGS, MRK, AT, FK, SLN, AK, MS, AR, PJR, FWM, and GD contributed to writing the paper.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1549-1676
1549-1277
1549-1676
DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020190