Deconstructing the Excellent Plastic Surgeon: A Survey of Key Attributes
Background: Most plastic surgeons practice in nonacademic settings, leaving a small subset of academic plastic surgeons with the responsibility of selecting the future generation of plastic surgeons without representation from a majority of our field. This raises questions as to whether the academic...
Saved in:
Published in | Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open Vol. 11; no. 12; p. e5460 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hagerstown, MD
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
01.12.2023
Wolters Kluwer |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2169-7574 2169-7574 |
DOI | 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005460 |
Cover
Summary: | Background:
Most plastic surgeons practice in nonacademic settings, leaving a small subset of academic plastic surgeons with the responsibility of selecting the future generation of plastic surgeons without representation from a majority of our field. This raises questions as to whether the academic attributes valued during residency selection are valid predictive markers of who will become an excellent plastic surgeon. A survey was conducted of both academic and nonacademic plastic surgeons, as well as trainees, to determine what traits are considered most essential to being an excellent plastic surgeon.
Methods:
An electronic survey was distributed before the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons 10th Annual Winter Meeting. Demographics and information regarding the respondents' training and academic status were collected. Respondents were asked to select five traits that they considered most important to be an excellent plastic surgeon from a list of 20 preselected traits. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to perform subgroup analyses.
Results:
A total of 187 responses were received from meeting attendees, representing an 89.0% response rate. Overall, the five values endorsed as most important for a plastic surgeon were being technically sound (53%), collaborative (48%), ethical (44%), compassionate (37%), and emotionally intelligent (33%). However, the emphasis placed on these different attributes differed significantly amongst different demographic groups.
Conclusion:
It is important that we use methods such as holistic review when evaluating plastic surgery applicants to ensure our selection process is congruent with the traits we value. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Published online 14 December 2023. Received for publication August 25, 2023; accepted October 17, 2023. Disclosure statements are at the end of this article, following the correspondence information. Related Digital Media are available in the full-text version of the article on www.PRSGlobalOpen.com. Paris Butler, MD, MPH, Division of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar Street, 3rd Floor BB, Office 330, New Haven, CT 06510, E-mail: paris.butler@yale.edu ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2169-7574 2169-7574 |
DOI: | 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005460 |