Accuracy of medicare claims-based diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: estimating positive predictive value on the basis of review of hospital records

Many cardiovascular epidemiologic studies rely on diagnosis codes in health care claims databases. Despite important changes in the care and diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the validity of hospital discharge diagnosis codes for AMI in the US Medicare system has not been recently exam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American heart journal Vol. 148; no. 1; pp. 99 - 104
Main Authors Kiyota, Yuka, Schneeweiss, Sebastian, Glynn, Robert J, Cannuscio, Carolyn C, Avorn, Jerry, Solomon, Daniel H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01.07.2004
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0002-8703
1097-6744
DOI10.1016/j.ahj.2004.02.013

Cover

More Information
Summary:Many cardiovascular epidemiologic studies rely on diagnosis codes in health care claims databases. Despite important changes in the care and diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the validity of hospital discharge diagnosis codes for AMI in the US Medicare system has not been recently examined. Our objective was to examine the accuracy of International Classification of Diseases—ninth revision—Clinical Modifications (ICD-9-CM) discharge diagnosis codes and diagnosis-related groups (DRG) codes for AMI in a Medicare claims database. We sampled hospitalization episodes from Medicare beneficiaries in Pennsylvania during 1999, 2000, or both. We used Medicare data to identify patients with hospitalizations containing indicators of AMI (ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes 410.X0 and 410.X1 or DRG codes 121, 122, and 123). Hospital records for these episodes were reviewed by trained abstractors using World Health Organization criteria for diagnosing AMI. We then calculated the positive predictive value of Medicare claims-based definitions of AMI. Of 2200 hospitalization episodes with Medicare diagnosis codes suggestive of AMI, 2022 hospital records (91.9%) were obtained. The positive predictive value for a primary Medicare claims-based definition was 94.1% (95% CI, 93.0%–95.2%). Positive predictive values for alternative claims-based definitions ranged slightly, with the definition including DRG codes and length-of-stay restrictions yielding the highest positive predictive value, 95.4% (95% CI, 94.3%–96.4%). Subjects with a history of myocardial infarction had a significantly lower positive predictive value than subjects without a history of myocardial infarction (88.1% vs 94.6%, P <.001). In this study, we observed high positive predictive values for a Medicare claims-based diagnosis of AMI and a diagnosis based on structured hospital record review.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-8703
1097-6744
DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2004.02.013