A machine learning algorithm for peripheral artery disease prognosis using biomarker data

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) biomarkers have been studied in isolation; however, an algorithm that considers a protein panel to inform PAD prognosis may improve predictive accuracy. Biomarker-based prediction models were developed and evaluated using a model development (n = 270) and prospective...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published iniScience Vol. 27; no. 3; p. 109081
Main Authors Li, Ben, Shaikh, Farah, Zamzam, Abdelrahman, Syed, Muzammil H., Abdin, Rawand, Qadura, Mohammad
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 15.03.2024
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2589-0042
2589-0042
DOI10.1016/j.isci.2024.109081

Cover

More Information
Summary:Peripheral artery disease (PAD) biomarkers have been studied in isolation; however, an algorithm that considers a protein panel to inform PAD prognosis may improve predictive accuracy. Biomarker-based prediction models were developed and evaluated using a model development (n = 270) and prospective validation cohort (n = 277). Plasma concentrations of 37 proteins were measured at baseline and the patients were followed for 2 years. The primary outcome was 2-year major adverse limb event (MALE; composite of vascular intervention or major amputation). Of the 37 proteins tested, 6 were differentially expressed in patients with vs. without PAD (ADAMTS13, ICAM-1, ANGPTL3, Alpha 1-microglobulin, GDF15, and endostatin). Using 10-fold cross-validation, we developed a random forest machine learning model that accurately predicts 2-year MALE in a prospective validation cohort of PAD patients using a 6-protein panel (AUROC 0.84). This algorithm can support PAD risk stratification, informing clinical decisions on further vascular evaluation and management. [Display omitted] •Biomarker-based prognostic tools are limited in peripheral artery disease (PAD)•A machine learning model accurately predicts 2-year PAD outcomes using 6 biomarkers•Performance remained robust on a prospective validation cohort (AUROC 0.84)•The model can support PAD risk stratification and inform clinical decision-making Artificial intelligence; Cardiovascular medicine; Machine learning
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
lead contact
These authors equally contributed
ISSN:2589-0042
2589-0042
DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2024.109081