An Evaluation of the Feasibility, Validity, and Reliability of Laparoscopic Skills Assessment in the Operating Room

• Published in: Annals of surgery Vol. 245; no. 6; pp. 992 - 999
• Main Authors: Aggarwal, Rajesh, Grantcharov, Teodor, Moorthy, Krishna, Milland, Thor, Papasavas, Pavlos, Dosis, Aristotelis, Bello, Fernando, Darzi, Ara
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hagerstown, MD Lippincott 01.06.2007
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - standards; Clinical Competence; Digestive system. Abdomen; Endoscopy; Feasibility Studies; General aspects; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Medical sciences; Operating Rooms; Original; Reproducibility of Results; Statistics, Nonparametric; Time and Motion Studies; Medicine; Evaluation; Validity; Treatment; Operating room; Surgery; Vocational aptitude; Feasibility; Laparoscopy; Endoscopy; Reliability
• ISSN: 0003-4932; 1528-1140; 1528-1140
• DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000262780.17950.e5

To assess the use of a synchronized video-based motion tracking device for objective, instant, and automated assessment of laparoscopic skill in the operating room. The assessment of technical skills is fundamental to recognition of proficient surgical practice. It is necessary to demonstrate the validity, reliability, and feasibility of any tool to be applied for objective measurement of performance. Nineteen subjects, divided into 13 experienced (performed >100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies) and 6 inexperienced (performed <10 LCs) surgeons completed LCs on 53 patients who all had a diagnosis of biliary colic. Each procedure was recorded with the ROVIMAS video-based motion tracking device to provide an objective measure of the surgeon's dexterity. Each video was also rated by 2 experienced observers on a previously validated operative assessment scale. There were significant differences for motion tracking parameters between the 2 groups of surgeons for the Calot triangle dissection part of procedure for time taken (P = 0.002), total path length (P = 0.026), and number of movements (P = 0.005). Both motion tracking and video-based assessment displayed intertest reliability, and there were good correlations between the 2 modes of assessment (r = 0.4 to 0.7, P < 0.01). An instant, objective, valid, and reliable mode of assessment of laparoscopic performance in the operating room has been defined. This may serve to reduce the time taken for technical skills assessment, and subsequently lead to accurate and efficient audit and credentialing of surgeons for independent practice.