Optimization of Processing Parameters in ECM of Die Tool Steel Using Nanofluid by Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm

Formation of spikes prevents achievement of the better material removal rate (MRR) and surface finish while using plain NaNO3 aqueous electrolyte in electrochemical machining (ECM) of die tool steel. Hence this research work attempts to minimize the formation of spikes in the selected workpiece of h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTheScientificWorld Vol. 2015; no. 2015; pp. 1 - 6
Main Authors Sathiyamoorthy, V., Elango, N., Sekar, T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2356-6140
1537-744X
1537-744X
DOI10.1155/2015/895696

Cover

More Information
Summary:Formation of spikes prevents achievement of the better material removal rate (MRR) and surface finish while using plain NaNO3 aqueous electrolyte in electrochemical machining (ECM) of die tool steel. Hence this research work attempts to minimize the formation of spikes in the selected workpiece of high carbon high chromium die tool steel using copper nanoparticles suspended in NaNO3 aqueous electrolyte, that is, nanofluid. The selected influencing parameters are applied voltage and electrolyte discharge rate with three levels and tool feed rate with four levels. Thirty-six experiments were designed using Design Expert 7.0 software and optimization was done using multiobjective genetic algorithm (MOGA). This tool identified the best possible combination for achieving the better MRR and surface roughness. The results reveal that voltage of 18 V, tool feed rate of 0.54 mm/min, and nanofluid discharge rate of 12 lit/min would be the optimum values in ECM of HCHCr die tool steel. For checking the optimality obtained from the MOGA in MATLAB software, the maximum MRR of 375.78277 mm3/min and respective surface roughness Ra of 2.339779 μm were predicted at applied voltage of 17.688986 V, tool feed rate of 0.5399705 mm/min, and nanofluid discharge rate of 11.998816 lit/min. Confirmatory tests showed that the actual performance at the optimum conditions was 361.214 mm3/min and 2.41 μm; the deviation from the predicted performance is less than 4% which proves the composite desirability of the developed models.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Academic Editor: Venkatesh Jaganathan
ISSN:2356-6140
1537-744X
1537-744X
DOI:10.1155/2015/895696