Plasma and CSF biomarkers in a memory clinic: Head‐to‐head comparison of phosphorylated tau immunoassays

Introduction Direct comparisons of the main blood phosphorylated tau immunoassays in memory clinic populations are needed to understand possible differences. Methods In the BIODEGMAR study, 197 participants presenting with cognitive complaints were classified into an Alzheimer's disease (AD) or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlzheimer's & dementia Vol. 19; no. 5; pp. 1913 - 1924
Main Authors Ashton, Nicholas J., Puig‐Pijoan, Albert, Milà‐Alomà, Marta, Fernández‐Lebrero, Aida, García‐Escobar, Greta, González‐Ortiz, Fernándo, Kac, Przemysław R., Brum, Wagner S., Benedet, Andréa L., Lantero‐Rodriguez, Juan, Day, Theresa A., Vanbrabant, Jeroen, Stoops, Erik, Vanmechelen, Eugeen, Triana‐Baltzer, Gallen, Moughadam, Setareh, Kolb, Hartmuth, Ortiz‐Romero, Paula, Karikari, Thomas K., Minguillon, Carolina, Hernández Sánchez, Juan José, Navalpotro‐Gómez, Irene, Grau‐Rivera, Oriol, María Manero, Rosa, Puente‐Periz, Víctor, Torre, Rafael, Roquer, Jaume, Dage, Jeff L., Zetterberg, Henrik, Blennow, Kaj, Suárez‐Calvet, Marc
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.05.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1552-5260
1552-5279
1552-5279
DOI10.1002/alz.12841

Cover

More Information
Summary:Introduction Direct comparisons of the main blood phosphorylated tau immunoassays in memory clinic populations are needed to understand possible differences. Methods In the BIODEGMAR study, 197 participants presenting with cognitive complaints were classified into an Alzheimer's disease (AD) or a non‐AD cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profile group, according to their amyloid beta 42/ phosphorylated tau (Aβ42/p‐tau) ratio. We performed a head‐to‐head comparison of nine plasma and nine CSF tau immunoassays and determined their accuracy to discriminate abnormal CSF Aβ42/p‐tau ratio. Results All studied plasma tau biomarkers were significantly higher in the AD CSF profile group compared to the non‐AD CSF profile group and significantly discriminated abnormal CSF Aβ42/p‐tau ratio. For plasma p‐tau biomarkers, the higher discrimination accuracy was shown by Janssen p‐tau217 (r = 0.76; area under the curve [AUC] = 0.96), ADx p‐tau181 (r = 0.73; AUC = 0.94), and Lilly p‐tau217 (r = 0.73; AUC = 0.94). Discussion Several plasma p‐tau biomarkers can be used in a specialized memory clinic as a stand‐alone biomarker to detect biologically‐defined AD. Highlights Patients with an Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid (AD CSF) profile have higher plasma phosphorylated tau (p‐tau) levels than the non‐AD CSF profile group. All plasma p‐tau biomarkers significantly discriminate patients with an AD CSF profile from the non‐AD CSF profile group. Janssen p‐tau217, ADx p‐tau181, and Lilly p‐tau217 in plasma show the highest accuracy to detect biologically defined AD. Janssen p‐tau217, ADx p‐tau181, Lilly p‐tau217, Lilly p‐tau181, and UGot p‐tau231 in plasma show performances that are comparable to their CSF counterparts.
Bibliography:Kaj Blennow and Marc Suárez‐Calvet are equal senior co‐authors on this work.
Nicholas J. Ashton, Albert Puig‐Pijoan, and Marta Milà‐Alomà contributed equally to this work.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Kaj Blennow and Marc Suárez-Calvet are equal senior co-authors on this work.
Nicholas J. Ashton, Albert Puig-Pijoan, and Marta Milà-Alomà contributed equally to this work.
Nicholas J. Ashton, Albert Puig-Pijoan, and Marta Milà-Alomà are co-first authors. Kaj Blennow and Marc Suárez-Calvet are co-senior authors. Kaj Blennow and Marc Suárez-Calvet had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Concept and design: Nicholas J. Ashton, Kaj Blennow, and Marc Suárez-Calvet. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Nicholas J. Ashton, Albert Puig-Pijoan, Marta Milà-Alomà, Aida Fernández-Lebrero, Greta García-Escobar, Fernando González-Ortiz, Przemysław R. Kac, Wagner S. Brum, Andréa L. Benedet, Juan Lantero-Rodriguez, Theresa A. Day, Jeroen Vanbrabant, Erik Stoops, Eugeen Vanmechelen, Gallen Triana-Baltzer, Setareh Moughadam, Hartmuth Kolb, Paula Ortiz-Romero, Thomas Karikari, Carolina Minguillon, Juan José Hernández Sánchez, Irene Navalpotro-Gómez, Oriol Grau-Rivera, Rosa María Manero, Víctor Puente-Periz, Rafael de la Torre, Jaume Roquer, Jeff L. Dage, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, and Marc Suárez-Calvet. Drafting of the manuscript: Nicholas J. Ashton, Albert Puig-Pijoan, Kaj Blennow, and Marc Suárez-Calvet. Statistical analysis: Albert Puig-Pijoan, Marta Milà-Alomà, Aida Fernández-Lebrero, Greta García-Escobar, and Marc Suárez-Calvet. Obtained funding: Irene Navalpotro-Gómez, Carolina Minguillón, Jaume Roquer, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, and Marc Suárez-Calvet. Administrative, technical, or material support: Aida Fernández-Lebrero, Greta García-Escobar, Fernando González-Ortiz, Przemysław R. Kac, Wagner S. Brum, Juan Lantero-Rodriguez, Paula Ortiz-Romero, and Carolina Minguillon. Supervision: Nicholas J. Ashton, Kaj Blennow, and Marc Suárez-Calvet. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
ISSN:1552-5260
1552-5279
1552-5279
DOI:10.1002/alz.12841