Impact of extreme (flat and steep) keratometry on the safety and efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 17854 - 8
• Main Authors: Luft, Nikolaus, Siedlecki, Jakob, Reinking, Franziska, Mayer, Wolfgang J., Schworm, Benedikt, Kassumeh, Stefan, Priglinger, Siegfried G., Dirisamer, Martin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 08.09.2021; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 692/308/409; 692/700/565/545; Acuity; Cornea; Eye; Eye surgery; Humanities and Social Sciences; Interfaces; Lasers; multidisciplinary; Ophthalmology; Patients; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Statistical analysis; Suctioning; Variance analysis
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97375-4

Little is known about the connection between preoperative keratometry and postoperative results of myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). To determine the influence of extreme (flat and steep) corneal keratometry on the safety and efficacy of SMILE, the databases of the Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany, and SMILE Eyes Linz, Austria, were screened for patients with steep and flat keratometry who had undergone SMILE. In this cross-sectional matched comparative cohort study, eyes with markedly flat (< 42.0 diopters; D) or steep (≥ 47.0D) preoperative corneal keratometry were matched to a cohort of eyes with regular keratometry (42.0–46.9D) by preoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent and cylinder, age, corrected distance visual acuity and surgical SMILE parameters. The standardized graphs and terms for refractive surgery results were applied to compare the three groups. Changes in higher order aberrations (HOAs) were evaluated on Scheimpflug imaging. In total, 63 eyes (21 each) of 54 patients with a mean refractive spherical equivalent of  − 5.21 ± 1.59 D were followed up for a mean of 9.2 ± 6.1 (minimum ≥ 3) months. Mean baseline keratometry was 41.3 ± 0.7D (flat), 45.5 ± 1.0D (regular) and 47.7 ± 0.6D (steep) (p < 0.0001). Compared to the regular group, the flat and the steep cornea group resulted in a non-inferior percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D of target refraction (p = 0.20), uncorrected distance visual acuity (p = 0.95) and corrected distance visual acuity (p = 0.20). Flat corneas however experienced a stronger induction of spherical aberration (SA) compared to the steep group (p = 0.0005). In conclusion, non-inferior outcomes of SMILE can also be expected in eyes with steep (≥ 47D) or flat (< 42D) preoperative keratometry, while SMILE however induces more SA in eyes with a flat keratometry.