Evaluation of External Apical Root Resorption in Cases with Extraction and Non-Extraction Fixed Orthodontic Treatment

• Published in: Diagnostics (Basel) Vol. 14; no. 20; p. 2338
• Main Authors: Peker, Ramazan Berkay, Meriç, Pamir
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.10.2024; MDPI
• Subjects: Bone resorption; Calibration; Care and treatment; Complications and side effects; dental radiography; Diagnosis; digital panoramic radiography; external root resorption; fixed orthodontic treatment; Medical records; Normal distribution; Orthodontics; Patients; Radiography; Risk factors; Roots; Software; Statistical analysis; Systemic diseases; Teeth; tooth length; Turkey; United States > US; dental radiography; digital panoramic radiography; tooth length; external root resorption; fixed orthodontic treatment
• ISSN: 2075-4418; 2075-4418
• DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14202338

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate external apical root resorption (EARR) in cases with extraction and non-extraction fixed orthodontic treatment. Methods: Ninety subjects were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: 43 with extraction treatment and 47 with non-extraction orthodontic treatment. EARR was measured using the crown-to-root ratio of the maxillary and mandibular incisors and canines on panoramic radiographs taken at the beginning (T0) and end of the treatment (T1). The Bonferroni corrected Z test was used for multiple comparisons. Results: There were 24 (55.8%) individuals in the extraction group and 12 (25.5%) in the non-extraction group, with a minimum of one tooth with severe resorption. There was no resorption in 0% of individuals in the extraction group and five (10.6%) individuals in the non-extraction group. There was a statistically significant correlation between the groups and the degree of resorption (p = 0.008). When the maxillary and mandibular teeth in the extraction group were compared, a significant difference was found in all degrees of resorption except for mild resorption. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in EARR between the extraction and non-extraction treatment groups, with maxillary incisors showing more resorption in the extraction treatment.