A longitudinal assessment of trial protocols approved by research ethics committees: The Adherance to SPIrit REcommendations in the UK (ASPIRE-UK) study

Background To assess the quality of reporting of RCT protocols approved by UK research ethics committees before and after the publication of the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guideline. Methods We had access to RCT study protocols that received ethical a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 601 - 9
Main Authors Speich, Benjamin, Odutayo, Ayodele, Peckham, Nicholas, Ooms, Alexander, Stokes, Jamie R., Saccilotto, Ramon, Gryaznov, Dmitry, von Niederhäusern, Belinda, Copsey, Bethan, Altman, Douglas G., Briel, Matthias, Hopewell, Sally
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 27.07.2022
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1745-6215
1745-6215
DOI10.1186/s13063-022-06516-1

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background To assess the quality of reporting of RCT protocols approved by UK research ethics committees before and after the publication of the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guideline. Methods We had access to RCT study protocols that received ethical approval in the UK in 2012 ( n =103) and 2016 ( n =108). From those, we assessed the adherence to the 33 SPIRIT items (i.e. a total of 64 components of the 33 SPIRIT items). We descriptively analysed the adherence to SPIRIT guidelines as proportion of adequately reported items (median and interquartile range [IQR]) and stratified the results by year of approval and sponsor. Results The proportion of reported SPIRIT items increased from a median of 64.9% (IQR, 57.6–69.2%) in 2012 to a median of 72.5% (IQR, 65.3–78.3%) in 2016. Industry-sponsored RCTs reported more SPIRIT items in 2012 (median 67.4%; IQR, 64.1–69.4%) compared to non-industry-sponsored trials (median 59.8%; IQR, 46.5–67.7%). This gap between industry- and non-industry-sponsored trials increased in 2016 (industry-sponsored: median 75.6%; IQR, 71.2–79.0% vs non-industry-sponsored: median 65.3%; IQR, 51.6–76.3%). Conclusions The adherence to SPIRIT guidelines has improved in the UK from 2012 to 2016 but remains on a modest level, especially for non-industry-sponsored RCTs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1745-6215
1745-6215
DOI:10.1186/s13063-022-06516-1