Influence of deep brain stimulation and levodopa on sensory signs in Parkinson's disease
To examine the effects of levodopa (L‐dopa) and deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN‐DBS) on sensory symptoms and signs in Parkinson's disease (PD). Seventeen patients with PD were included. (1) Presence of sensory symptoms and (2) effects of L‐dopa and STN‐DBS on sensory symp...
Saved in:
Published in | Movement disorders Vol. 25; no. 9; pp. 1195 - 1202 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
15.07.2010
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0885-3185 1531-8257 1531-8257 |
DOI | 10.1002/mds.23128 |
Cover
Summary: | To examine the effects of levodopa (L‐dopa) and deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN‐DBS) on sensory symptoms and signs in Parkinson's disease (PD). Seventeen patients with PD were included. (1) Presence of sensory symptoms and (2) effects of L‐dopa and STN‐DBS on sensory symptoms and signs [assessed by quantitative sensory testing (QST)] were examined 6 months after starting STN‐DBS. In addition, in 12 of these patients, presence of sensory symptoms prior and post STN‐DBS was compared. Pain was most frequently nociceptive. In about 30–40%, pain and sensory symptoms were associated with PD motor symptoms. In most of these cases, pain responded to L‐dopa. Intensity of pain was reduced post STN‐DBS compared to pre STN‐DBS. L‐Dopa had no influence on detection thresholds, whereas STN‐DBS improved thermal detection thresholds. However, thermal and mechanical pain thresholds were uninfluenced by L‐dopa or STN‐DBS. Although some patients reported an improvement of pain with STN‐DBS or L‐dopa, objectively pain sensitivity as assessed by QST was not altered by STN‐DBS or L‐dopa suggesting that there is no evidence for a direct modulation of central pain processing by L‐dopa or STN‐DBS. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Potential conflict of interest: None of the sponsors was involved in design and conduct of the study, in collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, in preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. There was no ghost writing by anyone not named on the author list. istex:AFB71037C3008BDF2D268256EA887E5F58AD8FD8 National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung - No. BMBF, 01EM05/04 ArticleID:MDS23128 EFIC-Grünenthal-Grant (E-G-G) Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft - No. DFG Ba1921/1-1/3 Pfizer Deutschland ark:/67375/WNG-9S67M60M-D ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0885-3185 1531-8257 1531-8257 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mds.23128 |