The glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications

There is controversy regarding the clinical utility of classifying foods according to their glycemic responses by using the glycemic index (GI). Part of the controversy is due to methodologic variables that can markedly affect the interpretation of glycemic responses and the GI values obtained. Rece...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of clinical nutrition Vol. 54; no. 5; pp. 846 - 854
Main Authors Wolever, TM, Jenkins, DJ, Jenkins, AL, Josse, RG
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bethesda, MD Elsevier Inc 01.11.1991
American Society for Clinical Nutrition
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0002-9165
1938-3207
DOI10.1093/ajcn/54.5.846

Cover

More Information
Summary:There is controversy regarding the clinical utility of classifying foods according to their glycemic responses by using the glycemic index (GI). Part of the controversy is due to methodologic variables that can markedly affect the interpretation of glycemic responses and the GI values obtained. Recent studies support the clinical utility of the GI. Within limits determined by the expected GI difference and by the day-to-day variation of glycemic responses, the GI predicts the ranking of the glycemic potential of different meals in individual subjects. In long-term trials, low-GI diets result in modest improvements in overall blood glucose control in patients with insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Of perhaps greater therapeutic importance is the ability of low-GI diets to reduce insulin secretion and lower blood lipid concentrations in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.
Bibliography:S20
S30
Q04
9163740
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-3
ISSN:0002-9165
1938-3207
DOI:10.1093/ajcn/54.5.846