Matching times: Trying to improve the correlation between heavy metal levels in mosses and bulk deposition

• Published in: The Science of the total environment Vol. 715; p. 136955
• Main Authors: Boquete, M.T., Ares, A., Fernández, J.A., Aboal, J.R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.05.2020
• Subjects: Air Pollutants; Air pollution; atmospheric deposition; Bryopsida; Cadmium; environmental factors; Environmental Monitoring; exposure duration; heavy metals; indigenous species; Lead; Mercury; Metals, Heavy; mosses and liverworts; Passive and active biomonitoring; pollution; Sphagnum; tissues; Lead; Cadmium; Air pollution; Mercury; Passive and active biomonitoring
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136955

The relationship between the concentrations of metals in moss tissues and atmospheric deposition is highly complex, resulting in a general lack of correlations between these two matrices. Here, we tried to improve the significance of the moss-bulk deposition (BD) relationship by eliminating the mismatch between the time that the moss tissue selected for analysis is exposed to atmospheric deposition, and the time during which BD is collected. For this, we analysed the concentrations of Cd, Hg and Pb in new grown tissue of Pseudoscleropodium purum and BD collected monthly, for one year, in 21 sampling sites (SS) under different degrees of pollution. Additionally, we assessed how different moss tissues, including native moss (green parts and new grown tissues of P. purum) and moss transplants of Sphagnum denticulatum, reflect BD to find out which moss tissues provide a better estimate of the atmospheric deposition of heavy metals. First of all, our results showed that eliminating the mismatch between native moss exposure time and BD collection period is not enough to improve their correlation. Environmental variation emerged as the main driver of tissue content variation altering the moss-BD relationship unpredictably. Secondly, native P. purum represents BD values better than devitalized transplants by displaying a greater number of significant correlations with BD. Specifically, green parts of P. purum generally represent better BD than new grown tissues. Overall, we conclude that neither native mosses nor transplants are good estimators of atmospheric heavy metal deposition rates. However, they are good qualitative indicators of the atmospheric deposition, by allowing us to differentiate SS subject to a wide range of pollution levels. Additionally, green parts of P. purum, and likely of other mosses with similar growth forms, should be used in passive biomonitoring studies to make results from different studies comparable. [Display omitted] •We studied which moss tissues provide a better estimate of the atmospheric deposition of heavy metals.•Environmental conditions affect the relation between bulk deposition and different moss tissues.•Native P. purum represents bulk deposition better than devitalized S. denticulatum transplants.•Green parts of P. purum are the best choice for passive monitoring of air quality.