A PSO–GA optimal model to estimate primary energy demand of China

To improve estimation efficiency for future projections, the present study has proposed a hybrid algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm optimal Energy Demand Estimating (PSO–GA EDE) model, for China. The coefficients of the three forms of the model (linear, exponential, and qua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnergy policy Vol. 42; pp. 329 - 340
Main Authors Yu, Shiwei, Wei, Yi-Ming, Wang, Ke
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2012
Elsevier
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0301-4215
1873-6777
DOI10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.090

Cover

More Information
Summary:To improve estimation efficiency for future projections, the present study has proposed a hybrid algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm optimal Energy Demand Estimating (PSO–GA EDE) model, for China. The coefficients of the three forms of the model (linear, exponential, and quadratic) are optimized by PSO–GA using factors, such as GDP, population, economic structure, urbanization rate, and energy consumption structure, that affect demand. Based on 20-year historical data between 1990 and 2009, the simulation results of the proposed model have greater accuracy and reliability than other single optimization methods. Moreover, it can be used with optimal coefficients for the energy demand projections of China. The departure coefficient method is applied to get the weights of the three forms of the model to obtain a combinational prediction. The energy demand of China is going to be 4.79, 4.04, and 4.48 billion tce in 2015, and 6.91, 5.03, and 6.11 billion tce (“standard” tons coal equivalent) in 2020 under three different scenarios. Further, the projection results are compared with other estimating methods. ► A hybrid algorithm PSO–GA optimal energy demands estimating model for China. ► Energy demand of China is estimated by 2020 in three different scenarios. ► The projection results are compared with other estimating methods.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.090
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ISSN:0301-4215
1873-6777
DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.090