Adaptive non‐invasive ventilation treatment for sleep apnea

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of two non‐invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) modalities to treat sleep apnea: (1) Average Volume Assured Pressure Support (AVAPS) NIV, and (2) Pressure Support (PS) NIV with Continuously Calculated Average Required Ventilation (CCARV...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHealthcare technology letters Vol. 11; no. 5; pp. 283 - 288
Main Authors Tehrani, Fleur T., Roum, James H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.10.2024
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2053-3713
2053-3713
DOI10.1049/htl2.12087

Cover

More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of two non‐invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) modalities to treat sleep apnea: (1) Average Volume Assured Pressure Support (AVAPS) NIV, and (2) Pressure Support (PS) NIV with Continuously Calculated Average Required Ventilation (CCARV). Two detailed (previously developed and tested) simulation models were used to assess the effectiveness of the NIV modalities. One simulated subjects without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and the other simulated patients with COPD. Sleep apnea was simulated in each model (COPD and Non‐COPD), and the ability of each NIV modality to normalize breathing was measured. In both NIV modalities, a low level continuous positive airway pressure was used and a backup respiratory rate was added to the algorithm in order to minimize the respiratory work rate. Both modalities could help normalize breathing in response to an episode of sleep apnea within about 5 min (during which time blood gases were within safe limits). AVAPS NIV and PS NIV with CCARV have potential value to be used for treatment of sleep apnea. Clinical evaluations are needed to fully assess the effectiveness of these NIV modalities. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of two non‐invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) modalities to treat sleep apnea. Two detailed (previously developed and tested) simulation models were used to assess the effectiveness of the NIV modalities in this simulation study. Both NIV modalities could help normalize breathing in response to an episode of sleep apnea within about 5 min during which time blood gases were within safe limits.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2053-3713
2053-3713
DOI:10.1049/htl2.12087