What impact will an increased number of teaching general practices have on patients, doctors and medical students?

Background  Recommendations for medical training have seen a growing drive for undergraduate teaching to take place within the community – primarily in the general practice surgery. In light of the ongoing expansion of medical student numbers, many more general practices will be required to particip...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical education Vol. 38; no. 12; pp. 1219 - 1228
Main Authors Mathers, Jonathan, Parry, Jayne, Lewis, Sarah, Greenfield, Sheila
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.12.2004
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0308-0110
1365-2923
DOI10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02014.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background  Recommendations for medical training have seen a growing drive for undergraduate teaching to take place within the community – primarily in the general practice surgery. In light of the ongoing expansion of medical student numbers, many more general practices will be required to participate in undergraduate teaching. Aim  To explore the perceptions of primary care staff on the impact that increasing student numbers will have on them, on their patients and on the students themselves. Design of study  Semi‐structured interviews Setting  Three general practices presently involved in undergraduate teaching, 3 practices about to become involved in undergraduate teaching and 1 non‐teaching practice, all in the Black Country area of the West Midlands. Methods  Semi‐structured interviews with prearranged prompts were undertaken with a variety of practice staff including general practitioners (GPs), practice managers and practice nurses, as well as administrative and reception staff. Results  Eleven GPs, 6 practice managers, 4 practice nurses and 6 receptionists/administrators took part in the interviews. Three main themes emerged relating to the effects on students and reflecting attitudes towards the Black Country, the experience of working among deprived populations and issues around access to the new training locations. The majority of interviewees were of the opinion that patients both enjoy taking part in undergraduate teaching and are able to benefit from the process. Positive impacts on practice infrastructure were also elicited, but when asked about the resource implications for the practice of undergraduate teaching, there was a dichotomy of opinion. Conclusion  For many practices, involvement in undergraduate teaching is a double‐edged sword.
Bibliography:istex:A31A9C557292AF070CAC74D973B22B9E51BC4607
ArticleID:MEDU2014
ark:/67375/WNG-30RB7M9F-6
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-General Information-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0308-0110
1365-2923
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02014.x