Prevalence of glucose intolerance in Asian Indians: Urban-rural difference and significance of upper body adiposity
Prevalence of glucose intolerance in Asian Indians. Urban-rural difference and significance of upper body adiposity. A Ramachandran , C Snehalatha , D Dharmaraj and M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Madras, India. Abstract OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the prevalence of NIDDM and IGT in the urban and...
Saved in:
Published in | Diabetes care Vol. 15; no. 10; pp. 1348 - 1355 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Alexandria, VA
American Diabetes Association
01.10.1992
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0149-5992 1935-5548 |
DOI | 10.2337/diacare.15.10.1348 |
Cover
Summary: | Prevalence of glucose intolerance in Asian Indians. Urban-rural difference and significance of upper body adiposity.
A Ramachandran ,
C Snehalatha ,
D Dharmaraj and
M Viswanathan
Diabetes Research Centre, Madras, India.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the prevalence of NIDDM and IGT in the urban and rural areas in southern India. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
METHODS--Two populations of the same ethnic background, but different socioeconomic background were chosen for this study.
Nine-hundred urban people and 1038 rural subjects were studied. Fasting and 2-h post-glucose capillary blood samples after
a 75 g oral glucose load (WHO criteria) were obtained in these randomly selected adults (greater than or equal to 20 yr of
age). RESULTS--Using the WHO criteria, the prevalence of NIDDM, adjusted to the age of the respective general population,
was 8.2% in the urban and 2.4% in the rural populations. The prevalence was 8.4 and 7.9%, respectively, in urban men and women,
and 2.6 and 1.6% in rural men and women. The age-adjusted prevalence of IGT was 8.7 and 7.8% in the urban and rural areas,
respectively. The prevalence of IGT was 8.8% in urban men and 8.3% in women; the corresponding values for rural men and women
were 8.7 and 6.4%. The prevalence of NIDDM increased with age, markedly so in the urban people. The urban-rural difference
was significant for NIDDM (chi 2 = 29.4, P less than 0.001) but not for IGT. In the urban population, 65% of the NIDDM patients
were known cases, whereas in the rural area, the known cases accounted for only 24%. Bivariate analysis showed an association
of BMI, STR, and WHR with prevalence of NIDDM plus IGT. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, age, BMI, STR, and WHR
were associated significantly with glucose intolerance in the urban population, whereas only age was significant in the rural
population. The best predictors of NIDDM were age, BMI, WHR, and urbanization. CONCLUSIONS--The study showed a high prevalence
of NIDDM in the urban southern Indian population. The prevalence of NIDDM in the same ethnic group in rural areas was significantly
lower. The prevalence of IGT was similar in both populations. Upper body adiposity was a significant predictor of NIDDM in
this population with low rates of obesity. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 9321780 S30 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0149-5992 1935-5548 |
DOI: | 10.2337/diacare.15.10.1348 |