BCL::MP-fold: Membrane protein structure prediction guided by EPR restraints
ABSTRACT For many membrane proteins, the determination of their topology remains a challenge for methods like X‐ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy has evolved as an alternative technique to study structure and dyn...
Saved in:
Published in | Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics Vol. 83; no. 11; pp. 1947 - 1962 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.11.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0887-3585 1097-0134 1097-0134 |
DOI | 10.1002/prot.24801 |
Cover
Summary: | ABSTRACT
For many membrane proteins, the determination of their topology remains a challenge for methods like X‐ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy has evolved as an alternative technique to study structure and dynamics of membrane proteins. The present study demonstrates the feasibility of membrane protein topology determination using limited EPR distance and accessibility measurements. The BCL::MP‐Fold (BioChemical Library membrane protein fold) algorithm assembles secondary structure elements (SSEs) in the membrane using a Monte Carlo Metropolis (MCM) approach. Sampled models are evaluated using knowledge‐based potential functions and agreement with the EPR data and a knowledge‐based energy function. Twenty‐nine membrane proteins of up to 696 residues are used to test the algorithm. The RMSD100 value of the most accurate model is better than 8 Å for 27, better than 6 Å for 22, and better than 4 Å for 15 of the 29 proteins, demonstrating the algorithms' ability to sample the native topology. The average enrichment could be improved from 1.3 to 2.5, showing the improved discrimination power by using EPR data. Proteins 2015; 83:1947–1962. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-RKJ5RT1L-P This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy - No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 ArticleID:PROT24801 istex:F97C54D2C664135E09AD5A6E0618533FB7A55100 Axel W. Fischer and Nathan S. Alexander contributed equally to this article under academic and business site licenses. The BCL source code is published under the BCL license and is available at The BCL software suite is available at . http://www.meilerlab.org/bclcommons ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 USDOE USDOE Office of Science AC05-00OR22725 None Contributed equally to this article |
ISSN: | 0887-3585 1097-0134 1097-0134 |
DOI: | 10.1002/prot.24801 |