A cell–cell interaction format for selection of high-affinity antibodies to membrane proteins

Generating and improving antibodies and peptides that bind specifically to membrane protein targets such as ion channels and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can be challenging using established selection methods. Current strategies are often limited by difficulties in the presentation of the ant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 116; no. 30; pp. 14971 - 14978
Main Authors Yang, Zhuo, Wan, Yue, Tao, Pingdong, Qiang, Min, Dong, Xue, Lin, Chih-Wei, Yang, Guang, Zheng, Tianqing, Lerner, Richard A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 23.07.2019
SeriesPNAS Plus
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI10.1073/pnas.1908571116

Cover

More Information
Summary:Generating and improving antibodies and peptides that bind specifically to membrane protein targets such as ion channels and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can be challenging using established selection methods. Current strategies are often limited by difficulties in the presentation of the antigen or the efficiency of the selection process. Here, we report a method for obtaining antibodies specific for whole cell membrane-associated antigens which combines a cell–cell interaction format based on yeast display technology with fluorescence-activated cell sorting of dual fluorescent complexes. Using this method, we were able to direct the affinity maturation of an antagonist antibody specific for the proton-gated ion channel ASIC1a and showed that both the affinity and potency were improved. We were also able to use this method to do kinetic selections to generate clones with better dissociation profiles. In addition, this method was employed successfully to handle the difficult problem of selecting antibodies specific to a GPCR target, the mu-opioid receptor.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
1Z.Y. and Y.W. contributed equally to this work.
Author contributions: Z.Y., Y.W., T.Z., and R.A.L. designed research; Z.Y., Y.W., P.T., M.Q., X.D., C.-W.L., and T.Z. performed research; Z.Y., Y.W., P.T., M.Q., X.D., C.-W.L., G.Y., T.Z., and R.A.L. analyzed data; and Z.Y., Y.W., T.Z., and R.A.L. wrote the paper.
Reviewers: R.A.D., University of Oxford; and S.M.S., Rockefeller University.
Contributed by Richard A. Lerner, June 3, 2019 (sent for review May 22, 2019; reviewed by Raymond Allen Dwek and Sanford M. Simon)
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1908571116