A cell–cell interaction format for selection of high-affinity antibodies to membrane proteins
Generating and improving antibodies and peptides that bind specifically to membrane protein targets such as ion channels and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can be challenging using established selection methods. Current strategies are often limited by difficulties in the presentation of the ant...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 116; no. 30; pp. 14971 - 14978 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
23.07.2019
|
Series | PNAS Plus |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1908571116 |
Cover
Summary: | Generating and improving antibodies and peptides that bind specifically to membrane protein targets such as ion channels and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can be challenging using established selection methods. Current strategies are often limited by difficulties in the presentation of the antigen or the efficiency of the selection process. Here, we report a method for obtaining antibodies specific for whole cell membrane-associated antigens which combines a cell–cell interaction format based on yeast display technology with fluorescence-activated cell sorting of dual fluorescent complexes. Using this method, we were able to direct the affinity maturation of an antagonist antibody specific for the proton-gated ion channel ASIC1a and showed that both the affinity and potency were improved. We were also able to use this method to do kinetic selections to generate clones with better dissociation profiles. In addition, this method was employed successfully to handle the difficult problem of selecting antibodies specific to a GPCR target, the mu-opioid receptor. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 1Z.Y. and Y.W. contributed equally to this work. Author contributions: Z.Y., Y.W., T.Z., and R.A.L. designed research; Z.Y., Y.W., P.T., M.Q., X.D., C.-W.L., and T.Z. performed research; Z.Y., Y.W., P.T., M.Q., X.D., C.-W.L., G.Y., T.Z., and R.A.L. analyzed data; and Z.Y., Y.W., T.Z., and R.A.L. wrote the paper. Reviewers: R.A.D., University of Oxford; and S.M.S., Rockefeller University. Contributed by Richard A. Lerner, June 3, 2019 (sent for review May 22, 2019; reviewed by Raymond Allen Dwek and Sanford M. Simon) |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1908571116 |