Addition of low-dose sufentanil to ropivacaine for reducing shivering and visceral traction pain during cesarean section
Objective To investigate the efficacy of low-dose sufentanil for preventing shivering and visceral traction pain during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, controlled study. A total of 112 full-term parturients who underwent elective caesarean delive...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of international medical research Vol. 49; no. 5; p. 3000605211017000 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London, England
SAGE Publications
01.05.2021
Sage Publications Ltd SAGE Publishing |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0300-0605 1473-2300 1473-2300 |
DOI | 10.1177/03000605211017000 |
Cover
Summary: | Objective
To investigate the efficacy of low-dose sufentanil for preventing shivering and visceral traction pain during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Methods
This was a prospective, randomized, controlled study. A total of 112 full-term parturients who underwent elective caesarean delivery were randomly divided into two groups. Group R received 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine intrathecally and group RS received 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine plus 5 µg sufentanil intrathecally.
Results
There were no significant differences in the maximum sensory block time, motor block time, duration of the surgery, and heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and blood oxygen saturation before and 1, 5, and 10 minutes after spinal anesthesia, and at the end of the surgery between the two groups. Shivering was significantly more common in group R (n = 30) than in group RS (n = 8). The incidence of visceral traction pain in group R (46.43%) was significantly higher than that in group RS (14.29%). There was no significant difference in the newborns’ Apgar scores between the groups.
Conclusion
Adding low-dose sufentanil to ropivacaine can significantly reduce the incidence of shivering and visceral traction pain after spinal anesthesia. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0300-0605 1473-2300 1473-2300 |
DOI: | 10.1177/03000605211017000 |