The Efficacy and Risk Profile of c-Met inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Meta-analysis

c-MET inhibitors are considered as a kind of novel drugs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. However, the results of different clinical studies involving c-MET inhibitors were not consistent. In this report, we performed Meta-analysis to investigate the beneficial and harmful effects of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 6; no. 1; p. 35770
Main Authors Ye, Sa, Li, Jiuke, Hao, Ke, Yan, Jianping, Zhou, Hongbin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 27.10.2016
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI10.1038/srep35770

Cover

More Information
Summary:c-MET inhibitors are considered as a kind of novel drugs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. However, the results of different clinical studies involving c-MET inhibitors were not consistent. In this report, we performed Meta-analysis to investigate the beneficial and harmful effects of these drugs from 9 studies including 1611 patients in target drug groups and 1605 patients in control groups. As a result, patients in target drugs group had longer progression free survival (PFS) (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66–0.99, p = 0.04) but not overall survival (OS) than those in control group, especially in Asian (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.42–0.76, p < 0.001), Non-squamous (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.97, p = 0.03), Phase III (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50–0.86, p = 0.002), previous treated (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63–0.95, p = 0.01) and small molecular compounds subgroups (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.78, p < 0.001). In addition, target drugs did not affect the objective response rate (ORR) but improved disease control rate (DCR) (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.02–1.46, p = 0.03) of NSCLC patients. Our study first indicated that targeting c-MET therapies improved PFS and DCR in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients, especially in previous treated Asian patients with adenocarcinoma.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/srep35770