Sustainability of Rearing System Using Multicriteria Analysis: Application in Commercial Poultry Production

The aim of the present study was to develop a multicriteria model for the comparison of three commercial poultry farms: organic with Ross 308 genotype (OR), organic with Naked Neck genotype (ONN) and a conventional system (C), which represents the most common commercial farming system. A model based...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnimals (Basel) Vol. 11; no. 12; p. 3483
Main Authors Rocchi, Lucia, Cartoni Mancinelli, Alice, Paolotti, Luisa, Mattioli, Simona, Boggia, Antonio, Papi, Francesco, Castellini, Cesare
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 07.12.2021
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2076-2615
2076-2615
DOI10.3390/ani11123483

Cover

More Information
Summary:The aim of the present study was to develop a multicriteria model for the comparison of three commercial poultry farms: organic with Ross 308 genotype (OR), organic with Naked Neck genotype (ONN) and a conventional system (C), which represents the most common commercial farming system. A model based on multicriteria decision analysis was developed, considering for the first time the One Welfare approach in an operational manner, including three dimensions: human, environmental and animal welfare. The three alternatives demonstrated different performances, according to the different dimensions considered. In particular, the two organic systems performed better for human welfare and animal welfare, with relevant differences due to the genetic strains used. Conventional rearing performed better for the environment index due to the method chosen. The multicriteria analysis showed that the organic system performed better overall than the conventional system. In particular, the use of an adapted Slow Growing (SG) strain positively affected the final rank, mainly by reducing welfare problems and producing good economic and social performance. The stability of the results was verified by performing a sensitivity analysis, specifically a weight stability analysis, which confirmed the strength of results.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2076-2615
2076-2615
DOI:10.3390/ani11123483