The five-factor personality inventory: cross-cultural generalizability across 13 countries

In the present study, we investigated the structural invariance of the Five‐Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI) across a variety of cultures. Self‐report data sets from ten European and three non‐European countries were available, representing the Germanic (Belgium, England, Germany, the Netherlands...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean Journal of Personality Vol. 17; no. 5; pp. 347 - 373
Main Authors Jolijn Hendriks, A. A., Perugini, Marco, Angleitner, Alois, Ostendorf, Fritz, Johnson, John A., De Fruyt, Filip, Hřebíčková, Martina, Kreitler, Shulamith, Murakami, Takashi, Bratko, Denis, Conner, Mark, Nagy, Janos, Rodríguez-Fornells, Antoni, Ruisel, Imrich
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.09.2003
SAGE Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0890-2070
1099-0984
DOI10.1002/per.491

Cover

More Information
Summary:In the present study, we investigated the structural invariance of the Five‐Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI) across a variety of cultures. Self‐report data sets from ten European and three non‐European countries were available, representing the Germanic (Belgium, England, Germany, the Netherlands, USA), Romance (Italy, Spain), and Slavic branches (Croatia, Czech Republic, Slovakia) of the Indo‐European languages, as well as the Semito‐Hamitic (Israel) and Altaic (Hungary, Japan) language families. Each data set was subjected to principal component analysis, followed by varimax rotation and orthogonal Procrustes rotation to optimal agreement with (i) the Dutch normative structure and (ii) an American large‐sample structure. Three criteria (scree test, internal consistency reliabilities of the varimax‐rotated components, and parallel analysis) were used to establish the number of factors to be retained for rotation. Clear five‐factor structures were found in all samples except in the smallest one (USA, N = 97). Internal consistency reliabilities of the five components were generally good and high congruence was found between each sample structure and both reference structures. More than 80% of the items were equally stable within each country. Based on the results, an international FFPI reference structure is proposed. This reference structure can facilitate standardized communications about Big Five scores across research programmes. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:VEGA - No. 2/7140/20
istex:C1E12D1FCF69216D829BCE88182BBCE80911EF60
Grant Agency of the Czech Republic - No. 406/99/1155; No. 406/01/1507
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) - No. 575-68-068
National Scientific Research Projects of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences - No. OTKA T 018466
ark:/67375/WNG-CHRGP2XG-C
ArticleID:PER491
Antoni Rodríguez‐Fornells is now at the Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
A. A. Jolijn Hendriks is now at the Department of Psychology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0890-2070
1099-0984
DOI:10.1002/per.491