Clinical Deployment of Explainable Artificial Intelligence of SPECT for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease

• Published in: JACC. Cardiovascular imaging Vol. 15; no. 6; pp. 1091 - 1102
• Main Authors: Otaki, Yuka, Singh, Ananya, Kavanagh, Paul, Miller, Robert J.H., Parekh, Tejas, Tamarappoo, Balaji K., Sharir, Tali, Einstein, Andrew J., Fish, Mathews B., Ruddy, Terrence D., Kaufmann, Philipp A., Sinusas, Albert J., Miller, Edward J., Bateman, Timothy M., Dorbala, Sharmila, Di Carli, Marcelo, Cadet, Sebastien, Liang, Joanna X., Dey, Damini, Berman, Daniel S., Slomka, Piotr J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2022
• Subjects: Artificial Intelligence; Coronary Angiography - methods; Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging; deep learning; diagnostic accuracy; Humans; Myocardial Perfusion Imaging - methods; Predictive Value of Tests; SPECT; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; LCX; diagnostic accuracy; CAD; MPI; AI; TPD; artificial intelligence; SPECT; LAD; AUC; deep learning; RCA; SSS
• ISSN: 1936-878X; 1876-7591; 1876-7591
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.04.030

Explainable artificial intelligence (AI) can be integrated within standard clinical software to facilitate the acceptance of the diagnostic findings during clinical interpretation. This study sought to develop and evaluate a novel, general purpose, explainable deep learning model (coronary artery disease–deep learning [CAD-DL]) for the detection of obstructive CAD following single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). A total of 3,578 patients with suspected CAD undergoing SPECT MPI and invasive coronary angiography within a 6-month interval from 9 centers were studied. CAD-DL computes the probability of obstructive CAD from stress myocardial perfusion, wall motion, and wall thickening maps, as well as left ventricular volumes, age, and sex. Myocardial regions contributing to the CAD-DL prediction are highlighted to explain the findings to the physician. A clinical prototype was integrated using a standard clinical workstation. Diagnostic performance by CAD-DL was compared to automated quantitative total perfusion deficit (TPD) and reader diagnosis. In total, 2,247 patients (63%) had obstructive CAD. In 10-fold repeated testing, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) (95% CI) was higher according to CAD-DL (AUC: 0.83 [95% CI: 0.82-0.85]) than stress TPD (AUC: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.77-0.80]) or reader diagnosis (AUC: 0.71 [95% CI: 0.69-0.72]; P < 0.0001 for both). In external testing, the AUC in 555 patients was higher according to CAD-DL (AUC: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.76-0.84]) than stress TPD (AUC: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.69-0.77]) or reader diagnosis (AUC: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.61-0.69]; P < 0.001 for all). The present model can be integrated within standard clinical software and generates results rapidly (<12 seconds on a standard clinical workstation) and therefore could readily be incorporated into a typical clinical workflow. The deep-learning model significantly surpasses the diagnostic accuracy of standard quantitative analysis and clinical visual reading for MPI. Explainable artificial intelligence can be integrated within standard clinical software to facilitate acceptance of artificial intelligence diagnosis of CAD following MPI. [Display omitted]