Network connectivity predicts effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation in focal epilepsy

Abstract Responsive neurostimulation is a promising treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy; however, clinical outcomes are highly variable across individuals. The therapeutic mechanism of responsive neurostimulation likely involves modulatory effects on brain networks; however, with no known bi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrain communications Vol. 4; no. 3; p. fcac104
Main Authors Fan, Joline M., Lee, Anthony T., Kudo, Kiwamu, Ranasinghe, Kamalini G., Morise, Hirofumi, Findlay, Anne M., Kirsch, Heidi E., Chang, Edward F., Nagarajan, Srikantan S., Rao, Vikram R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2632-1297
2632-1297
DOI10.1093/braincomms/fcac104

Cover

More Information
Summary:Abstract Responsive neurostimulation is a promising treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy; however, clinical outcomes are highly variable across individuals. The therapeutic mechanism of responsive neurostimulation likely involves modulatory effects on brain networks; however, with no known biomarkers that predict clinical response, patient selection remains empiric. This study aimed to determine whether functional brain connectivity measured non-invasively prior to device implantation predicts clinical response to responsive neurostimulation therapy. Resting-state magnetoencephalography was obtained in 31 participants with subsequent responsive neurostimulation device implantation between 15 August 2014 and 1 October 2020. Functional connectivity was computed across multiple spatial scales (global, hemispheric, and lobar) using pre-implantation magnetoencephalography and normalized to maps of healthy controls. Normalized functional connectivity was investigated as a predictor of clinical response, defined as percent change in self-reported seizure frequency in the most recent year of clinic visits relative to pre-responsive neurostimulation baseline. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve quantified the performance of functional connectivity in predicting responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) and non-responders (<50%). Leave-one-out cross-validation was furthermore performed to characterize model performance. The relationship between seizure frequency reduction and frequency-specific functional connectivity was further assessed as a continuous measure. Across participants, stimulation was enabled for a median duration of 52.2 (interquartile range, 27.0–62.3) months. Demographics, seizure characteristics, and responsive neurostimulation lead configurations were matched across 22 responders and 9 non-responders. Global functional connectivity in the alpha and beta bands were lower in non-responders as compared with responders (alpha, pfdr < 0.001; beta, pfdr < 0.001). The classification of responsive neurostimulation outcome was improved by combining feature inputs; the best model incorporated four features (i.e. mean and dispersion of alpha and beta bands) and yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.970 (0.919–1.00). The leave-one-out cross-validation analysis of this four-feature model yielded a sensitivity of 86.3%, specificity of 77.8%, positive predictive value of 90.5%, and negative predictive value of 70%. Global functional connectivity in alpha band correlated with seizure frequency reduction (alpha, P = 0.010). Global functional connectivity predicted responder status more strongly, as compared with hemispheric predictors. Lobar functional connectivity was not a predictor. These findings suggest that non-invasive functional connectivity may be a candidate personalized biomarker that has the potential to predict responsive neurostimulation effectiveness and to identify patients most likely to benefit from responsive neurostimulation therapy. Follow-up large-cohort, prospective studies are required to validate this biomarker. These findings furthermore support an emerging view that the therapeutic mechanism of responsive neurostimulation involves network-level effects in the brain. To prognosticate outcomes with neurostimulation for epilepsy, Fan et al. investigate functional network connectivity measured non-invasively with magnetoencephalography as a novel biomarker for effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation (RNS) therapy. Resting-state functional connectivity in alpha and beta frequency bands predicted response to subsequent RNS therapy and correlated with seizure frequency reduction. See Hitten Zaveri (https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac114) for a scientific commentary on this article. Graphical Abstract Depicting truncated methodology and findings. Thirty-one patients underwent presurgical magnetoencephalography (MEG) evaluation prior to responsive neurostimulation (RNS) implantation. First, resting-state functional connectivity was computed based on presurgical MEG and normalized to healthy individuals. Second, averaged functional connectivity between RNS responders and non-responders were compared. Third, the classification performance using functional connectivity and the relationship between seizure reduction and functional connectivity were evaluated.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Co-senior authors.
ISSN:2632-1297
2632-1297
DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcac104