Veridical data science
Building and expanding on principles of statistics, machine learning, and scientific inquiry, we propose the predictability, computability, and stability (PCS) framework for veridical data science. Our framework, composed of both a workflow and documentation, aims to provide responsible, reliable, r...
Saved in:
| Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 117; no. 8; pp. 3920 - 3929 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
25.02.2020
|
| Series | Inaugural Article |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1901326117 |
Cover
| Summary: | Building and expanding on principles of statistics, machine learning, and scientific inquiry, we propose the predictability, computability, and stability (PCS) framework for veridical data science. Our framework, composed of both a workflow and documentation, aims to provide responsible, reliable, reproducible, and transparent results across the data science life cycle. The PCS workflow uses predictability as a reality check and considers the importance of computation in data collection/storage and algorithm design. It augments predictability and computability with an overarching stability principle. Stability expands on statistical uncertainty considerations to assess how human judgment calls impact data results through data and model/algorithm perturbations. As part of the PCS workflow, we develop PCS inference procedures, namely PCS perturbation intervals and PCS hypothesis testing, to investigate the stability of data results relative to problem formulation, data cleaning, modeling decisions, and interpretations. We illustrate PCS inference through neuroscience and genomics projects of our own and others. Moreover, we demonstrate its favorable performance over existing methods in terms of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in highdimensional, sparse linear model simulations, including a wide range of misspecified models. Finally, we propose PCS documentation based on R Markdown or Jupyter Notebook, with publicly available, reproducible codes and narratives to back up human choices made throughout an analysis. The PCS workflow and documentation are demonstrated in a genomics case study available on Zenodo. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 AC02-05CH11231 USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER). Earth and Environmental Systems Science Division Author contributions: B.Y. and K.K. designed research, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper. Reviewers: J.S.L., Harvard University; D.M., Columbia University; and L.W., Carnegie Mellon University. This contribution is part of the special series of Inaugural Articles by members of the National Academy of Sciences elected in 2014. Contributed by Bin Yu, November 25, 2019 (sent for review January 25, 2019; reviewed by Jun S. Liu, David Madigan, and Larry Wasserman) |
| ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
| DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1901326117 |