Fast 3D YOLOv3 based standard plane regression of vertebral bodies in intra-operative CBCT volumes

• Published in: Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) Vol. 10; no. 3; p. 034503
• Main Authors: Doerrich, Sebastian, Kordon, Florian, Denzinger, Felix, El Barbari, Jan S., Privalov, Maxim, Vetter, Sven Y., Maier, Andreas, Kunze, Holger
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 01.05.2023; SPIE
• Subjects: Computer-Aided Diagnosis; CT imaging; Detectors; Flat panel displays; orthopedics; plane regression; multiplanar reconstruction; flat panel computed tomography
• ISSN: 2329-4302; 2329-4310; 2329-4310
• DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.3.034503

Mobile C-arm systems represent the standard imaging devices within the field of spine surgery. In addition to 2D imaging, they allow for 3D scans while preserving unrestricted patient access. For viewing, the acquired volumes are adjusted such that their anatomical standard planes align with the axes of the viewing modality. This difficult and time-consuming step is currently performed manually by the leading surgeon. This process is automatized within this work to improve the usability of C-arm systems. Thereby, the spinal region consisting of multiple vertebrae and the standard planes of all vertebrae being of interest to the surgeon need to be taken into account. An object detection algorithm based on the you only look once version 3 architecture, adapted to 3D inputs, is compared with a segmentation-based approach employing a 3D U-Net. Both algorithms are trained on a dataset of 440 and tested on 218 spinal volumes. Although the detection-based algorithm is slightly inferior concerning the detection (91% versus 97% accuracy), localization (1.26 mm versus 0.74 mm error) and alignment accuracy (5.00 deg versus 4.73 deg error), it outperforms the segmentation-based one in terms of speed (5 s versus 38 s). Both algorithms show similar good results. However, the speed gain of the detection-based algorithm, resulting in a run time of 5 s, makes it more suitable for usage in an intra-operative scenario.