Degree of mucositis and duration of neutropenia are the major risk factors for early post-transplant febrile neutropenia and severe bacterial infections after reduced-intensity conditioning

Background and objectives: Whether the intensity of the conditioning regimen affects febrile neutropenia (FN) and severe bacterial infections (SBIs) is not well established. We analyzed the risk factors (RFs) for the development of FN and SBI in the first 100 d post‐transplant in 195 consecutive adu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of haematology Vol. 88; no. 1; pp. 46 - 51
Main Authors Facchini, Luca, Martino, Rodrigo, Ferrari, Angela, Piñana, José L., Valcárcel, David, Barba, Pere, Granell, Miguel, Delgado, Julio, Briones, Javier, Sureda, Anna, Brunet, Salut, Sierra, Jorge
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0902-4441
1600-0609
1600-0609
DOI10.1111/j.1600-0609.2011.01724.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background and objectives: Whether the intensity of the conditioning regimen affects febrile neutropenia (FN) and severe bacterial infections (SBIs) is not well established. We analyzed the risk factors (RFs) for the development of FN and SBI in the first 100 d post‐transplant in 195 consecutive adult recipients of a reduced‐intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (RIC‐allo). Materials and methods: The RIC regimens consisted of fludarabine plus melphalan (62%) or busulphan (38%) (FluMel or FluBu). SBIs include pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and bacteremia. Results: FN occurred in 141 patients (72%), always in the first 30 d post‐allo‐RIC. However, a SBI occurred in only 27 patients (14%) during this early post‐transplant period (<day +30), while 29 evaluable patients (15%) developed a SBI in the intermediate post‐transplant period (days +31 to +100). In multivariate analysis, RFs for the development of FN included onset of neutropenia before day +5 after allo‐RIC (P < 0.02) and NCI CTC grade III–IV mucosal damage in the first 10 d post‐transplantation (P = 0.03). RFs identified to SBI by multivariate analysis included corticosteroid therapy before day +100 (P < 0.01), mycophenolate mofetil‐based graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (P < 0.01), and previous SBI before day +30 (P < 0.01). The rate of SBI from day +30 to +100 varied according to the number of RFs; thus, the rate of SBI was 1% in patients without any RF, 17% in patients with one RF, 29% with one RFs, and 53% in those with all three RFs. Conclusions: After an RIC‐allo, FN and early SBI occurred mostly in patients with severe mucositis and early‐onset neutropenia, while postengraftment high‐dose steroid therapy for acute GVHD was the major RF.
Bibliography:ArticleID:EJH1724
istex:5228D736CDDEB513AF862E26E645989FF3B955DE
ark:/67375/WNG-PDTW7RHF-0
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0902-4441
1600-0609
1600-0609
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0609.2011.01724.x