Postoperative analgesia using fentanyl plus celecoxib versus epidural anesthesia after laparoscopic colon resection
Purpose Effective postoperative analgesia is essential to a patient’s recovery after laparoscopic colon resection (LCR). We introduce a new analgesic protocol using fentanyl plus celecoxib following LCR. Methods The subjects of this retrospective comparative study were 137 patients who underwent LCR...
Saved in:
Published in | Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan) Vol. 47; no. 2; pp. 174 - 181 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Tokyo
Springer Japan
01.02.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0941-1291 1436-2813 1436-2813 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00595-016-1356-y |
Cover
Summary: | Purpose
Effective postoperative analgesia is essential to a patient’s recovery after laparoscopic colon resection (LCR). We introduce a new analgesic protocol using fentanyl plus celecoxib following LCR.
Methods
The subjects of this retrospective comparative study were 137 patients who underwent LCR, 63 of whom were treated with 72 h of epidural anesthesia (group E), and 74 of whom were treated with 24 h of fentanyl intravenous injection followed by 7 days of oral celecoxib (group FC). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of this new protocol.
Results
The combination of fentanyl and celecoxib maintained a low postoperative pain score (<1.5, evaluated by the FACES Pain Scale) and reduced the need for rescue analgesic drugs for 7 days (groups E vs. FC: 5.39 ± 3.77 vs. 2.79 ± 2.92,
p
< 0.001). The postoperative hospital stay was almost equal for the two groups (E vs. FC: 11.1 ± 4.5 vs. 10.3 ± 4.8 days,
p
= 0.315). The operating room stay other than for surgery was significantly shorter for group FC (E vs. FC: 128.7 ± 30.5 vs. 107.2 ± 17.0 min,
p
< 0.001). Neither group experienced complications, apart from one group FC patient, who suffered transient nausea and vertigo.
Conclusions
The new analgesic protocol using fentanyl plus celecoxib is an effective and time-saving strategy for LCR. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0941-1291 1436-2813 1436-2813 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00595-016-1356-y |