Renal Handling of Galectin‐3 in the General Population, Chronic Heart Failure, and Hemodialysis

Background Galectin‐3 is a biomarker for prognostication and risk stratification of patients with heart failure (HF). It has been suggested that renal function strongly relates to galectin‐3 levels. We aimed to describe galectin‐3 renal handling in HF. Methods and Results In Sprague–Dawley rats, we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Heart Association Vol. 3; no. 5; pp. e000962 - n/a
Main Authors Meijers, Wouter C., Velde, A. Rogier, Ruifrok, Willem P., Schroten, Nicolas F., Dokter, Martin M., Damman, Kevin, Assa, Solmaz, Franssen, Casper F., Gansevoort, Ron T., Gilst, Wiek H., Silljé, Herman H., Boer, Rudolf A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2047-9980
2047-9980
DOI10.1161/JAHA.114.000962

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background Galectin‐3 is a biomarker for prognostication and risk stratification of patients with heart failure (HF). It has been suggested that renal function strongly relates to galectin‐3 levels. We aimed to describe galectin‐3 renal handling in HF. Methods and Results In Sprague–Dawley rats, we infused galectin‐3 and studied distribution and renal clearance. Furthermore, galectin‐3 was measured in urine and plasma of healthy controls, HF patients and hemodialysis patients. To mimic the human situation, we measured galectin‐3 before and after the artificial kidney. Infusion in rats resulted in a clear increase in plasma and urine galectin‐3. Plasma galectin‐3 in HF patients (n=101; mean age 64 years; 93% male) was significantly higher compared to control subjects (n=20; mean age 58 years; 75% male) (16.6 ng/mL versus 9.7 ng/mL, P<0.001), while urinary galectin‐3 in HF patients was comparable (28.1 ng/mL versus 35.1 ng/mL, P=0.830). The calculated galectin‐3 excretion rate was lower in HF patient (2.3 mL/min [1.5 to 3.4] versus 3.9 mL/min [2.3 to 6.4] in control subjects; P=0.005). This corresponded with a significantly lower fractional excretion of galectin‐3 in HF patients (2.4% [1.7 to 3.7] versus 3.0% [1.9 to 5.5]; P=0.018). These differences, however, were no longer significant after correction for age, gender, diabetes, and smoking. HF patients who received diuretics (49%) showed significantly higher aldosterone and galectin‐3 levels. Hemodialysis patients (n=105; mean age 63 years; 65% male), without urinary galectin‐3 excretion, had strongly increased median plasma galectin‐3 levels (70.6 ng/mL). Conclusions In this small cross‐sectional study, we report that urine levels of galectin‐3 are not increased in HF patients, despite substantially increased plasma galectin‐3 levels. The impaired renal handling of galectin‐3 in patients with HF may explain the described relation between renal function and galectin‐3 and may account for the elevated plasma galectin‐3 in HF.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Accompanying Tables S1 through S7 are available at http://jaha.ahajournals.org/content/00/00/e000962/suppl/DC1
ISSN:2047-9980
2047-9980
DOI:10.1161/JAHA.114.000962