Single-stage Composite Skin Reconstruction Using a Dermal Regeneration Template

• Published in: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open Vol. 8; no. 2; p. e2622
• Main Authors: Rudnicki, Pamela A., Purt, Boonyapa, True, Daniel, Siordia, Hector, Lohmeier, Steven, Chan, Rodney K.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons 01.02.2020; Copyright The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved; Wolters Kluwer Health
• Subjects: Original
• ISSN: 2169-7574; 2169-7574
• DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002622

BACKGROUND:Composite reconstruction with a dermal substitute followed by skin graft is sometimes used for reconstructing high-quality skin while preserving donor sites. This often necessitates 2 separate procedures, additional general anesthetic, and longer hospitalization. Concurrent use of dermal substitutes and skin graft in a single stage has been previously reported in small series. Here, we report our experience with single-stage skin reconstruction with Integra and split-thickness skin graft for coverage of wounds post burn eschar excision and post burn scar contracture release. METHODS:This is a retrospective review of consecutive operations from 2013 to 2017 in which single-stage bilayer reconstruction (SSBR) was performed. Data were obtained from electronic medical records and perioperative photographs. RESULTS:In this 5-year period, 13 surgical sites were identified in which SSBR was used in 8 subjects. Average and median graft take was 86.2% and 95%, respectively. Graft take was over 90% in 10 out of 13 cases. One case required regrafting after initial graft failure. CONCLUSIONS:In the appropriate setting, SSBR is a practical technique in covering wounds post burn eschar excision and post burn scar contracture release resulting in reasonable graft take. Use of noncontaminated wound beds is crucial. Although there is risk of regrafting, it is not clear whether this risk is any higher than in split-thickness skin grafting alone. This study was unable to evaluate contribution of dermal substitute to contraction, function, and mobility, nor how hypothesized improvement of skin quality compares to the original thick dermal substitute. We recommend further investigation.