Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text

This study investigated whether individual differences in working memory (WM) span are associated with different WM management strategies during the reading of expository text. In Experiment 1, probe questions were presented on line during reading to determine whether thematic information was mainta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMemory & cognition Vol. 23; no. 6; pp. 735 - 748
Main Authors Budd, Desiree, Whitney, Paul, Turley, Kandi Jo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Psychonomic Society 01.11.1995
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0090-502X
1532-5946
1532-5946
DOI10.3758/BF03200926

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study investigated whether individual differences in working memory (WM) span are associated with different WM management strategies during the reading of expository text. In Experiment 1, probe questions were presented on line during reading to determine whether thematic information was maintained in WM throughout comprehension. The data indicated that readers across the range of WM span maintained thematic information in WM throughout the reading of a given passage. In Experiment 2, sentence reading times and accuracy for both topic and detail questions were measured in two conditions: when topic sentences were present and when topic sentences were absent. Subjects performed similarly across the range of WM span in the topic-present condition, but lower span subjects performed more poorly on detail questions in the topic-absent condition. In Experiment 3, the topic-present condition of the second experiment was replicated, except that subjects expected to receive questions about details only. Thematic processing and retention of topic and detail information all increased with span. Taken together, these results suggest that, for more difficult text processing tasks, high- and low-span subjects adopt different WM management strategies and these strategies influence what is learned from reading the text.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0090-502X
1532-5946
1532-5946
DOI:10.3758/BF03200926