Molecular Biomarkers Related to Oral Carcinoma: Clinical Trial Outcome Evaluation in a Literature Review

Backgrounds. The objective of the present research was to systematically revise the international literature about the genetic biomarkers related to oral cancer (OC) evaluating the recent findings in clinical studies. Methods. A comprehensive review of the current literature was conducted according...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDisease markers Vol. 2019; no. 2019; pp. 1 - 11
Main Authors Santoro, Rossella, Laino, Luigi, Laino, Gregorio, Cicciù, Marco, De Stefano, Rosa, D’Amico, Cesare, Crimi, Salvatore, Bianchi, Alberto, Umberto, Romeo, Herford, Alan Scott, Fiorillo, Luca, Cervino, G., Troiano, Giuseppe
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Publishing Corporation 01.01.2019
Hindawi
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0278-0240
1875-8630
1875-8630
DOI10.1155/2019/8040361

Cover

More Information
Summary:Backgrounds. The objective of the present research was to systematically revise the international literature about the genetic biomarkers related to oral cancer (OC) evaluating the recent findings in clinical studies. Methods. A comprehensive review of the current literature was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines by accessing the NCBI PubMed database. The authors conducted the search of articles in the English language published from 2008 to 2018. The present systematic review included only papers with significant results about correlation between wound healing, genetic alteration, and OC. Prognostic capacity of genetic markers was not evaluated in vivo. Results. The first analysis with filters recorded about 1884 published papers. Beyond reading and consideration of suitability, only 20 and then 8 papers, with case report exclusion, were recorded for the revision. Conclusion. All the researches recorded the proteomic and genetic alterations in OC human biopsy cells. The gene modification level in the different studies, compared with samples of healthy tissues, has always been statistically significant, but it is not possible to associate publications with each other because each job is based on the measurement of different biomarkers and gene targets. Further investigations should be required in order to state scientific evidence about a clear advantage of using these biomarkers for diagnostic purpose.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Guest Editor: Biagio Ricciuti
ISSN:0278-0240
1875-8630
1875-8630
DOI:10.1155/2019/8040361