The V6-V1 interpeak interval: a novel criterion for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture

Abstract Aims We hypothesized that during left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, the various possible combinations of direct capture/non-capture of the septal myocardium and the LBB result in distinct patterns of right and left ventricular activation. This could translate into different combinations...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropace (London, England) Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 40 - 47
Main Authors Jastrzębski, Marek, Burri, Haran, Kiełbasa, Grzegorz, Curila, Karol, Moskal, Paweł, Bednarek, Agnieszka, Rajzer, Marek, Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 04.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1099-5129
1532-2092
1532-2092
DOI10.1093/europace/euab164

Cover

More Information
Summary:Abstract Aims We hypothesized that during left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, the various possible combinations of direct capture/non-capture of the septal myocardium and the LBB result in distinct patterns of right and left ventricular activation. This could translate into different combinations of R-wave peak time (RWPT) in V1 and V6. Consequently, the V6-V1 interpeak interval could differentiate the three types of LBB area capture: non-selective (ns-)LBB, selective (s-)LBB, and left ventricular septal (LVS). Methods and results Patients with unquestionable evidence of LBB capture were included. The V6-V1 interpeak interval, V6RWPT, and V1RWPT were compared between different types of LBB area capture. A total of 468 patients from two centres were screened, with 124 patients (239 electrocardiograms) included in the analysis. Loss of LVS capture resulted in an increase in V1RWPT by ≥15 ms but did not impact V6RWPT. Loss of LBB capture resulted in an increase in V6RWPT by ≥15 ms but only minimally influenced V1RWPT. Consequently, the V6-V1 interval was longest during s-LBB capture (62.3 ± 21.4 ms), intermediate during ns-LBB capture (41.3 ± 14.0 ms), and shortest during LVS capture (26.5 ± 8.6 ms). The optimal value of the V6-V1 interval value for the differentiation between ns-LBB and LVS capture was 33 ms (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 84.7%). A specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of LBB capture was obtained with a cut-off value of >44 ms. Conclusion The V6-V1 interpeak interval is a promising novel criterion for the diagnosis of LBB area capture.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1099-5129
1532-2092
1532-2092
DOI:10.1093/europace/euab164