The association between quality of contraceptive counseling and selection of contraceptive method post-counseling among women in Ethiopia

• Published in: Contraception (Stoneham) Vol. 124; p. 110060
• Main Authors: Ermias, Yokabed, Averbach, Sarah H., Dey, Arnab K., Gebrehanna, Ewenat, Holt, Kelsey
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2023
• Subjects: Contraception; Contraception - methods; Contraception Behavior; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive counseling; Counseling - methods; Ethiopia; Family planning; Family Planning Services - methods; Female; Humans; Quality of care; Ethiopia; Contraceptive counseling; Family planning; Contraception; Ethiopia; Quality of care
• ISSN: 0010-7824; 1879-0518; 1879-0518
• DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110060

To better understand the relationship between high-quality contraceptive counseling and met family planning needs, we examined the association between quality of counseling and selection of a method postvisit among women requesting contraception in Ethiopia. We used post-counseling survey data from women receiving care in public health centers and nongovernmental clinics in three regions in Ethiopia. Among women whose reason for visit was requesting a contraceptive method, we examined the association between scores on the validated quality of contraceptive counseling (QCC) scale and subscales and selection of a method post-counseling (primary analysis) and type of method selected (secondary analysis). We conducted mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression for the primary analysis and multinomial regression for the secondary analysis. There was a nonsignificant increase in odds of selecting contraception with increasing total QCC scale scores (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.35, 0.43–12.95). However, among women experiencing no disrespect and abuse, there was increasing odds of selecting contraception (aOR 3.46, 95% CI 1.09–10.99) and likelihood of selecting injectable contraception (adjusted relative risk ratio 4.27, 95% CI 1.34–13.60) compared to women experiencing disrespect and abuse. Additionally, 168 (32.1%) of women felt pressured by their provider to use a certain method of which>50% selected long-acting reversible contraception. Increasing QCC is associated with selecting contraception among women requesting contraception. Additionally, probing for negative experiences can reveal feelings of disrespect and abuse that could lead women to avoid selecting contraception or feeling pressured to use methods heavily promoted by providers. Our study assesses contraceptive counseling quality using a validated tool with items on provider pressure and other forms of disrespect and abuse; findings highlight the importance of respectful treatment in meeting women’s needs and the potential influence of disrespect on decision to select contraception and type of method selected.