Compensating for Tumor Motion by a 6-Degree-of-Freedom Treatment Couch: Is Patient Tolerance an Issue?

To determine whether patients could tolerate the motion of a robotic couch that compensates for breathing-induced tumor motion. A total of 10 healthy subjects and 23 radio-oncology patients underwent simulated extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (two 30-min sessions) on a robotic couch programmed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 74; no. 1; pp. 168 - 171
Main Authors Sweeney, Reinhart A., Arnold, Winfried, Steixner, Eva, Nevinny-Stickel, Meinhard, Lukas, Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0360-3016
1879-355X
1879-355X
DOI10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.069

Cover

More Information
Summary:To determine whether patients could tolerate the motion of a robotic couch that compensates for breathing-induced tumor motion. A total of 10 healthy subjects and 23 radio-oncology patients underwent simulated extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (two 30-min sessions) on a robotic couch programmed to follow a fictitious tumor trajectory of 20×5×5 mm (cranio–caudal, left–right, and anterior–posterior directions, respectively) while rotating 2° around a cranio–caudal axis at a frequency of 5 seconds per loop. No session had to be interrupted and no nausea was induced. However, one patient refused the second session due to general deterioration and not all patients could keep their arms elevated for the entire session. Our findings showed that most patients tolerated compensatory couch motion and that motion sickness should not pose a problem in the investigation of this tumor-tracking method.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0360-3016
1879-355X
1879-355X
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.069