Fundamental Movement Skills and Their Assessment in Primary Schools from the Perspective of Teachers

Evidence suggests that children struggle to acquire age-appropriate fundamental movement skills (FMS), despite their importance for facilitating physical activity. This has led to calls for routine school-based screening of children's FMS. However, there is limited research exploring schools�...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMeasurement in physical education and exercise science Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 236 - 249
Main Authors Eddy, Lucy, Hill, Liam J.B., Mon-Williams, Mark, Preston, Nick, Daly-Smith, Andy, Medd, Gareth, Bingham, Daniel D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia Routledge 03.07.2021
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1091-367X
1532-7841
1532-7841
DOI10.1080/1091367X.2021.1874955

Cover

More Information
Summary:Evidence suggests that children struggle to acquire age-appropriate fundamental movement skills (FMS), despite their importance for facilitating physical activity. This has led to calls for routine school-based screening of children's FMS. However, there is limited research exploring schools' capacity to conduct such assessments. This study investigated what factors might affect the adoption and implementation of FMS assessments in primary schools. School staff (n = 853) completed an online questionnaire developed using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behavior (COM-B) model. A majority reported that knowledge of pupils' FMS ability would be beneficial (65.3%), and 71.8% would assess FMS if support was provided. Barriers included: Capability - few possessed knowledge of FMS (15%); Opportunity - teachers reported 30-60 minutes as acceptable for assessing a class, a substantially shorter period than current assessments require; Motivation - 57.2% stated FMS assessments would increase workload stress. Solutions to these issues are discussed using the COM-B theoretical framework.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1091-367X
1532-7841
1532-7841
DOI:10.1080/1091367X.2021.1874955