Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery: Role in Training the Next Generation of Spine Surgeons

Objective: This study aimed to assess the degree of interest in robot-assisted spine surgery (RASS) among residents and to investigate the learning curve for beginners performing robotic surgery.Methods: We conducted a survey to assess awareness and interest in RASS among young neurosurgery resident...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurospine Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 116 - 127
Main Authors Lee, Jun Seok, Son, Dong Wuk, Lee, Su Hun, Lee, Jong Hyeok, Kim, Young Ha, Lee, Sang Weon, Oh, Bu Kwang, Sung, Soon Ki, Song, Geun Sung, Yi, Seong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 01.03.2024
대한척추신경외과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2586-6583
2586-6591
2586-6591
DOI10.14245/ns.2448006.003

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective: This study aimed to assess the degree of interest in robot-assisted spine surgery (RASS) among residents and to investigate the learning curve for beginners performing robotic surgery.Methods: We conducted a survey to assess awareness and interest in RASS among young neurosurgery residents. Subsequently, we offered a hands-on training program using a dummy to educate one resident. After completing the program, the trained resident performed spinal fusion surgery with robotic assistance under the supervision of a mentor. The clinical outcomes and learning curve associated with robotic surgery were then analyzed.Results: Neurosurgical residents had limited opportunities to participate in spinal surgery during their training. Despite this, there was a significant interest in the emerging field of robotic surgery. A trained resident performed RASS under the supervision of a senior surgeon. A total of 166 screw insertions were attempted in 28 patients, with 2 screws failing due to skiving. According to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification, 85.54% of the screws were rated as grade A, 11.58% as grade B, 0.6% as grade C, and 1.2% as grade D. The clinical acceptance rate was approximately 96.99%, which is comparable to the results reported by senior experts and time per screw statistically significantly decreased as experience was gained.Conclusion: RASS can be performed with high accuracy within a relatively short timeframe, if residents receive adequate training.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448006.003
ISSN:2586-6583
2586-6591
2586-6591
DOI:10.14245/ns.2448006.003