Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review

Standards-based, computable knowledge representations for eligibility criteria are increasingly needed to provide computer-based decision support for automated research participant screening, clinical evidence application, and clinical research knowledge management. We surveyed the literature and id...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of biomedical informatics Vol. 43; no. 3; pp. 451 - 467
Main Authors Weng, Chunhua, Tu, Samson W., Sim, Ida, Richesson, Rachel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1532-0464
1532-0480
1532-0480
DOI10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004

Cover

More Information
Summary:Standards-based, computable knowledge representations for eligibility criteria are increasingly needed to provide computer-based decision support for automated research participant screening, clinical evidence application, and clinical research knowledge management. We surveyed the literature and identified five aspects of eligibility criteria knowledge representation that contribute to the various research and clinical applications: the intended use of computable eligibility criteria, the classification of eligibility criteria, the expression language for representing eligibility rules, the encoding of eligibility concepts, and the modeling of patient data. We consider three of these aspects (expression language, codification of eligibility concepts, and patient data modeling) to be essential constructs of a formal knowledge representation for eligibility criteria. The requirements for each of the three knowledge constructs vary for different use cases, which therefore should inform the development and choice of the constructs toward cost-effective knowledge representation efforts. We discuss the implications of our findings for standardization efforts toward knowledge representation for sharable and computable eligibility criteria.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1532-0464
1532-0480
1532-0480
DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004