The Relation Between Consumers' Frontal Alpha Asymmetry, Attitude, and Investment Decision

• Published in: Frontiers in neuroscience Vol. 14; p. 577978
• Main Authors: Di Gruttola, Francesco, Malizia, Andrea P., D'Arcangelo, Sonia, Lattanzi, Nicola, Ricciardi, Emiliano, Orfei, Maria Donata
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 21.01.2021; Frontiers Media S.A
• Subjects: Asymmetry; Attitudes; Behavior; consumer attitude; consumer choice; Consumers; Decision making; decision-making -investments; EEG-electroencephalogram; Experiments; frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA); Information processing; Investments; Motivation; Neuroscience; pupil diameter; EEG-electroencephalogram; consumer attitude; pupil diameter; decision-making -investments; frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA); consumer choice
• ISSN: 1662-453X; 1662-4548; 1662-453X
• DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.577978

The frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) is a neurophysiological measure of motivation and preference. Despite the FAA is associated to commercial pleasantness, conflicting evidence emerged in the literature regarding its relationship with behavior. To study the association between FAA and consumers' decision, we manipulated a commercial script to elicit diverse consumers' attitudes and decisions and to evaluate whether the FAA score is associated to their final investment. A little informative script (S1) was used to polarize consumers' attitudes and investments toward unfavorable scores, while a more personalized message (S2) to elicit in customers a favorable attitude and higher investments. Twenty-one participants listened to the scripts, and their FAA, attitude, and monetary investment were measured. In S1, the FAA did not correlate with neither attitude nor the investment decision, while a robust negative correlation between these variables was found in S2. No other peripheral body and neural measures associated with attitude or final decision. Our data suggest that the FAA correlates with attitude and decision, when a commercial script is customized and provides an adequate information, likely leading the consumer to a more reasoned and planned decision-making process. When facilitating a favorable attitude toward an offer, the negative correlation of FAA and behavior may reflect the involvement of a control system, whose role is to monitor and govern possible conflicts between approach and avoidance motivations. This observation provides additional indication on the value of FAA as a marker of consumer behaviors, and how it could be affected by experimental and contextual bias.