Isometric Force Parameters and Trunk Muscle Recruitment Strategies in a Population With Low Back Pain

This study correlates changes in trunk isometric force parameters and trunk muscle recruitment strategies in subjects with low back pain (LBP) and healthy participants. A control group study with repeated measures was performed. Study participants included 15 control subjects and 14 patients with LB...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics Vol. 30; no. 2; pp. 91 - 97
Main Authors Descarreaux, Martin, Lalonde, Catherine, Normand, Martin C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Mosby, Inc 01.02.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0161-4754
1532-6586
1532-6586
DOI10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.016

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study correlates changes in trunk isometric force parameters and trunk muscle recruitment strategies in subjects with low back pain (LBP) and healthy participants. A control group study with repeated measures was performed. Study participants included 15 control subjects and 14 patients with LBP. Participants were required to exert 50% and 75% of their maximal trunk flexion and extension. In a learning phase, feedback was provided, after which study participants were asked to perform 10 trials without any feedback. Spatiotemporal parameters of muscular activity and force production were recorded. Dependent variables included time to peak force, peak force variability, absolute error in peak force, electromyogram (EMG) burst duration for agonist muscles, and normalized integrated EMG. Average time to peak force was significantly longer for subjects with LBP than for healthy subjects. Subjects with LBP showed longer burst duration for all 4 muscles recorded. No group difference was noted in normalized integrated EMG. We suggest that the observed changes in trunk motor control and trunk muscle recruitment strategies are not only mediated by a neurophysiologic adaptation to chronic pain but also by cognitive adaptations modulated by fear of movement and fear of reinjury.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0161-4754
1532-6586
1532-6586
DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.016