Digital biomarker‐based individualized prognosis for people at risk of dementia
Background Research investigating treatments and interventions for cognitive decline fail due to difficulties in accurately recognizing behavioral signatures in the presymptomatic stages of the disease. For this validation study, we took our previously constructed digital biomarker‐based prognostic...
Saved in:
Published in | Alzheimer's & dementia : diagnosis, assessment & disease monitoring Vol. 12; no. 1; pp. e12073 - n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2352-8729 2352-8729 |
DOI | 10.1002/dad2.12073 |
Cover
Summary: | Background
Research investigating treatments and interventions for cognitive decline fail due to difficulties in accurately recognizing behavioral signatures in the presymptomatic stages of the disease. For this validation study, we took our previously constructed digital biomarker‐based prognostic models and focused on generalizability and robustness of the models.
Method
We validated prognostic models characterizing subjects using digital biomarkers in a longitudinal, multi‐site, 40‐month prospective study collecting data in memory clinics, general practitioner offices, and home environments.
Results
Our models were able to accurately discriminate between healthy subjects and individuals at risk to progress to dementia within 3 years. The model was also able to differentiate between people with or without amyloid neuropathology and classify fast and slow cognitive decliners with a very good diagnostic performance.
Conclusion
Digital biomarker prognostic models can be a useful tool to assist large‐scale population screening for the early detection of cognitive impairment and patient monitoring over time. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | The work includes human subjects and follows the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines. Informed consent was obtained for experimentation. The privacy rights of human subjects were always observed. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2352-8729 2352-8729 |
DOI: | 10.1002/dad2.12073 |